Is monitor_trademark_renew working right now?
io.github.colinhughes2121/gocreative-agent-api · mcp-registry/io.github.colinhughes2121/gocreative-agent-api/monitor_trademark_renew
Recovery track record: 20 outages in 90 days, median time-to-recovery 2 min.
Recent contract changes
Schema/catalog changes Glimind observed on this server — a changed contract can silently break a previously working call.
added—adslibrary_compare(2026-08-10)added—adslibrary_page(2026-08-10)added—adslibrary_search(2026-08-10)added—amazon_products_asin(2026-08-10)added—amazon_products_price(2026-08-10)
See all live alternatives to monitor_trademark_renew →
Never call a dead tool again
Agents that check Glimind first make fewer failed calls, waste fewer tokens, and auto-route around outages like this one. Add it in ~10 seconds — free, no signup:
# MCP client — add one endpoint: https://glimind.com/mcp # or wrap your calls with the SDK: npm i glimind # pip install glimind
FAQ
Is monitor_trademark_renew working right now?
As of the latest check, monitor_trademark_renew (mcp-registry/io.github.colinhughes2121/gocreative-agent-api/monitor_trademark_renew) has a Glimind reliability score of 85/100 (grade B) and its current verdict is "healthy" — recommendation: proceed. Glimind tracks this live from safe liveness probes plus privacy-clean real-usage outcomes.
How reliable is monitor_trademark_renew?
monitor_trademark_renew scores 85/100 (grade B) on the Glimind reliability standard. The score is neutral and unconflicted — Glimind sells no tools.
What should I do if monitor_trademark_renew is down or failing?
Healthy — standard retry (1–2x) with jitter on transient errors. Use a timeout around 3819ms. Check Glimind for a live alternative before retrying.
What are the best alternatives to monitor_trademark_renew?
Glimind surfaces live, capability-matched alternatives the moment monitor_trademark_renew degrades — query https://glimind.com/v1/alternatives/mcp-registry%2Fio.github.colinhughes2121%2Fgocreative-agent-api%2Fmonitor_trademark_renew.
How do I call monitor_trademark_renew reliably?
Before calling, check monitor_trademark_renew with Glimind (MCP: prepare_tool_call, or GET https://glimind.com/v1/prepare/mcp-registry%2Fio.github.colinhughes2121%2Fgocreative-agent-api%2Fmonitor_trademark_renew) to get a known-good input shape, the expected output, a suggested timeout (~3819ms), and a live fallback.
Embed this live badge
Show live reliability in your README or status page. It auto-updates and links back here — copy one:
[](https://glimind.com/tool/mcp-registry%2Fio.github.colinhughes2121%2Fgocreative-agent-api%2Fmonitor_trademark_renew?ref=badge)
<a href="https://glimind.com/tool/mcp-registry%2Fio.github.colinhughes2121%2Fgocreative-agent-api%2Fmonitor_trademark_renew?ref=badge"><img src="https://glimind.com/v1/badge/mcp-registry%2Fio.github.colinhughes2121%2Fgocreative-agent-api%2Fmonitor_trademark_renew.svg" alt="Glimind reliability"></a>
.. image:: https://glimind.com/v1/badge/mcp-registry%2Fio.github.colinhughes2121%2Fgocreative-agent-api%2Fmonitor_trademark_renew.svg :target: https://glimind.com/tool/mcp-registry%2Fio.github.colinhughes2121%2Fgocreative-agent-api%2Fmonitor_trademark_renew?ref=badge :alt: Glimind reliability
Operator of io.github.colinhughes2121/gocreative-agent-api?
Claim this listing → Prove you control this server (GitHub repo, live endpoint, or DNS — automated, ~1 min) to unlock the Verified operator marker, a remediation checklist (exactly why your score is what it is + how to raise it), and owner analytics. Or just embed the badge above and improve your score by having users report real outcomes (privacy-clean) via the free SDK. Glimind is neutral and sells no tools — the score is never for sale, so the fastest path to a better score is real uptime plus real usage.
Get the data (agents)
Query https://glimind.com/mcp (MCP) or GET https://glimind.com/v1/health/mcp-registry%2Fio.github.colinhughes2121%2Fgocreative-agent-api%2Fmonitor_trademark_renew. The signed reliability feed for gateways/routers: GET https://glimind.com/v1/reliability/feed.
Rating methodology is transparent and neutral — Glimind sells no tools and runs no integrations; it only measures. Updated 2026-08-14T10:33:02.408Z.
This score is an automated estimate derived from safe liveness probes and privacy-clean outcomes reported by users; it may be incomplete, delayed, or inaccurate, and reflects reachability from Glimind's vantage point — not a statement of fact about the service. Glimind is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting for this tool or its operator; all names belong to their owners. Operator? Request a correction, or remove your server from measurement, via https://glimind.com/opt-out or [email protected] — we act promptly.