mcp-registry/money.tideline/money-tools · v1.1.0
As of 2026-10-22 02:20 UTC, the Tideline Money Tools MCP server is up with a Glimind reliability score of 97/100 (grade A). Over the last 30 days it answered 100% of Glimind's liveness checks.
Free money calculators: option expiry risk, debt avalanche, cash runway, subscriptions, invoices.
Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http tideline-money-tools-mcp-server https://mcp.tideline.money/mcp
Claude Desktop · Windsurf · Cline (mcpServers JSON)
{
"mcpServers": {
"tideline-money-tools-mcp-server": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://mcp.tideline.money/mcp"
}
}
}
Third-party server, listed as discovered. Review its source before installing.
13 parameter(s) across 7 tool(s) have no description.
Add a "description" to each parameter with its format and an example ("ISO 8601 date, e.g. 2026-10-17"). This is the commonest cause of wrong arguments on the first call. How to fix →
7 of 7 tool(s) carry no readOnlyHint/destructiveHint annotations.
Annotate read-only tools with {"readOnlyHint": true}. Agents and gateways can then run them without a confirmation prompt, and route around destructive ones. How to fix →
1 tool(s) look like they change state (create/send/delete/pay…) but declare no destructiveHint.
Set annotations {"readOnlyHint": false, "destructiveHint": true|false, "idempotentHint": …}. Clients use these to ask the user before a side effect and to auto-approve safe reads. How to fix →
No tool declares an outputSchema.
Declare outputSchema and return structuredContent (MCP 2025-06-18+). Agents can then parse results without guessing, and chain tools reliably. How to fix →
Paste-ready definitions with the problems above fixed. Changes marked verify need a human look. 7 tool(s) still need parameter descriptions written by someone who knows the API. All of them as JSON: /v1/readiness/mcp-registry%2Fmoney.tideline%2Fmoney-tools/fixes
{
"name": "cash_runway",
"description": "Months of cash runway for a household or freelance practice — hard runway (committed income only) and working runway, against honest burn including paying yourself.",
"inputSchema": {
"type": "object",
"required": [
"cash_on_hand",
"monthly_expenses"
],
"properties": {
"owner_draw": {
"type": "number",
"description": "what you pay yourself monthly"
},
"cash_on_hand": {
"type": "number"
},
"monthly_expenses": {
"type": "number"
},
"monthly_income_probable": {
"type": "number"
},
"monthly_income_committed": {
"type": "number"
}
}
},
"annotations": {
"readOnlyHint": false,
"destructiveHint": false,
"idempotentHint": false
}
}{
"name": "debt_consolidation_check",
"description": "Should you consolidate credit cards with a personal loan? Compares paying the cards directly (same monthly amount, highest rate first, 0% promo aware) against up to two loan offers, including origination fees, shortfall/extra cash, and early payoff — shows interest+fees by payoff month and the month a fee offer stops being the better deal. Deterministic arithmetic; no credit data.",
"inputSchema": {
"type": "object",
"required": [
"cards",
"offers"
],
"properties": {
"cards": {
"type": "array",
"items": {
"type": "object",
"required": [
"balance",
"apr"
],
"properties": {
"apr": {
"type": "number",
"description": "annual %, e.g. 27"
},
"name": {
"type": "string"
},
"balance": {
"type": "number"
},
"apr_after_promo": {
"type": "number",
"description": "APR % after the promo ends"
},
"promo_months_left": {
"type": "integer",
"description": "months left on a 0% promo, if any"
}
}
}
},
"offers": {
"type": "array",
"items": {
"type": "object",
"required": [
"amount",
"interest_rate",
"term_months"
],
"properties": {
"amount": {
"type": "number"
},
"term_months": {
"type": "integer"
},
"interest_rate": {
"type": "number",
"description": "interest rate % (NOT the APR, which already includes the fee)"
},
"fee_is_percent": {
"type": "boolean"
},
"origination_fee": {
"type": "number"
}
}
},
"maxItems": 2
},
"payoff_months": {
"type": "integer",
"description": "when you expect to pay everything off; defaults to the full term"
},
"monthly_budget": {
"type": "number",
"description": "monthly amount for the keep-the-cards comparison; defaults to offer A's payment"
}
}
},
"annotations": {
"readOnlyHint": true
}
}Get an email or webhook when this server's readiness drops by 10+ points, tool-poisoning text appears, or a tool breaks:
curl -X POST https://glimind.com/v1/subscriptions -H 'content-type: application/json' -d '{"tools":["mcp-registry/money.tideline/money-tools"],"email":"[email protected]"}'Agents: watch_tool({"toolId": "mcp-registry/money.tideline/money-tools"}) over MCP.
option_expiry_risk ~474 tokensdebt_consolidation_check ~420 tokensdebt_avalanche_plan ~180 tokenseffective_hourly_rate ~171 tokensinvoice_aging ~155 tokensStatic checks of the advertised tools/list (schema, descriptions, annotations, tool-poisoning patterns, names, size) plus observed protocol, uptime, latency and contract changes. Read-only: no tool is ever called. Weights: schema 15, docs 20, safety 15, efficiency 15, compatibility 15, protocol 5, reliability 10, stability 5. Token counts are estimates (~3.6 characters per token).
Operator? Fix these, then re-check live. Embed the readiness badge:
[](https://glimind.com/server/mcp-registry%2Fmoney.tideline%2Fmoney-tools?ref=badge)
<a href="https://glimind.com/server/mcp-registry%2Fmoney.tideline%2Fmoney-tools?ref=badge"><img src="https://glimind.com/v1/readiness/badge/mcp-registry%2Fmoney.tideline%2Fmoney-tools.svg" alt="MCP agent-readiness"></a>
.. image:: https://glimind.com/v1/readiness/badge/mcp-registry%2Fmoney.tideline%2Fmoney-tools.svg :target: https://glimind.com/server/mcp-registry%2Fmoney.tideline%2Fmoney-tools?ref=badge :alt: MCP agent-readiness
Glimind records every version of this server's tool definitions in a signed, append-only transparency log. Current manifest sha256:756474d5fb4beec2…, first seen 2026-10-17, included at leaf 451 of 42,917. Version history · verify what your client received.
Compare: most reliable finance servers
Glimind tells agents whether a server is up right now and how to call it, then fails over to a live alternative when it isn't.
Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http glimind https://glimind.com/mcp
Claude Desktop · Windsurf · Cline (mcpServers JSON)
{
"mcpServers": {
"glimind": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://glimind.com/mcp"
}
}
}
As of 2026-10-22 02:20 UTC, the Tideline Money Tools MCP server is up with a Glimind reliability score of 97/100 (grade A). Over the last 30 days it answered 100% of Glimind's liveness checks.
Tideline Money Tools MCP server advertises 7 tools, including cash_runway, debt_avalanche_plan, debt_consolidation_check, effective_hourly_rate, invoice_aging.
Point your MCP client at this streamable-http endpoint: https://mcp.tideline.money/mcp
Glimind scanned all 7 tool definitions for tool-poisoning patterns — hidden or invisible characters, instructions that override the model, concealment from the user, requests to read credential or MCP config files, conversation exfiltration and cross-tool shadowing — and found none. This checks what the server tells the model, not what its code does; review the source before granting access to sensitive data.
Status page: 90-day uptime, every outage and how long it lasted.
Claim this listing to get the Verified operator marker, a remediation checklist and owner analytics, or embed the live badge from any of the tool pages above. Maintainers: alerts, deploy attestation and monthly reports.
Status is an automated estimate from Glimind's liveness checks (handshake and tool listing only; no tool is ever called) and may lag or differ from your network. Glimind is not affiliated with this server or its operator. Operator? Request a correction or opt out at https://glimind.com/opt-out.