Is the 0xdaniellopez Phishunt MCP server down?

mcp-registry/io.github.0xdaniellopez/phishunt · v0.1.0

Also listed as glama/0xdaniellopez/phishunt-mcp

healthy
Last checked 2026-10-25 14:19 UTC · handshake 68ms

As of 2026-10-25 14:19 UTC, the 0xdaniellopez Phishunt MCP server is up with a Glimind reliability score of 100/100 (grade A). Over the last 30 days it answered 100% of Glimind's liveness checks.

uptime (30d checks)
100%
checks observed
4,705
outages (90d)
0
tools
11

Public phishing feed: suspicious/confirmed phishing URLs detected hourly. No auth, CC0.

Install 0xdaniellopez Phishunt MCP server

Add to Cursor Add to VS Code

Claude Code

claude mcp add --transport http 0xdaniellopez-phishunt-mcp-server https://mcp.phishunt.io/

Claude Desktop · Windsurf · Cline (mcpServers JSON)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "0xdaniellopez-phishunt-mcp-server": {
      "type": "http",
      "url": "https://mcp.phishunt.io/"
    }
  }
}

Third-party server, listed as discovered. Review its source before installing.

Agent-readiness: A (90/100)

A (90/100): 0 error(s), 1 warning(s) across 11 tool(s); ~2,997 tokens of tool definitions.
Scores higher than 70% of 15,703 MCP servers Glimind has audited.
Its tool list costs an agent ~2,997 tokens per session — more than 55% of servers.
88 → 90 since 2026-10-17
no tool-poisoning patterns
Schemas100
Descriptions100
Safety hints30
Token cost100
Client compatibility100
Protocol100
Reliability100
Stability100

What to fix (1)

11 of 11 tool(s) carry no readOnlyHint/destructiveHint annotations.

Annotate read-only tools with {"readOnlyHint": true}. Agents and gateways can then run them without a confirmation prompt, and route around destructive ones. How to fix →

Tools: analyze_url, analyze_url_deep, check_domain, get_brand_metadata, get_campaign and 6 more

Auto-fix: 11 corrected tool definitions

Paste-ready definitions with the problems above fixed. Changes marked verify need a human look. All of them as JSON: /v1/readiness/mcp-registry%2Fio.github.0xdaniellopez%2Fphishunt/fixes

analyze_url 1 change
{
  "name": "analyze_url",
  "description": "Analyze any URL for phishing signals WITHOUT contacting it (passive). Read `verdict` first: it is the single adjudicated call (phishing / likely_phishing / suspicious / no_evidence / not_assessed), with `verdict_confidence` and `verdict_basis` (short phrases) explaining why - it reconciles phishunt's stored score/verdict (ground truth, if the domain is already known) against everything else so you don't have to guess which field outranks which. Beside the verdict sits `probability` (it does not ",
  "inputSchema": {
    "type": "object",
    "required": [
      "url"
    ],
    "properties": {
      "url": {
        "type": "string",
        "description": "Full URL or bare domain to analyze; prefer the bare domain if the URL carries tokens"
      }
    }
  },
  "annotations": {
    "readOnlyHint": true
  }
}
analyze_url_deep 1 change
{
  "name": "analyze_url_deep",
  "description": "ACTIVE deep analysis of a URL: unlike analyze_url (which NEVER contacts the target), this tool actively fetches it - HTTP response, TLS certificate, RDAP registration, nameservers, and GeoIP, all through a SOCKS5 proxy - and re-scores it with phishunt's full 5-layer detection engine. Use it only when analyze_url's passive signals are inconclusive and you need active evidence (live HTTP/redirect behavior, certificate freshness, registrant data); it is NOT a default first call. SLOW: typically 15-",
  "inputSchema": {
    "type": "object",
    "required": [
      "url"
    ],
    "properties": {
      "url": {
        "type": "string",
        "description": "Full URL or bare domain to actively analyze. This URL WILL be contacted, unlike analyze_url; prefer the bare domain if the URL carries tokens."
      }
    }
  },
  "annotations": {
    "readOnlyHint": true
  }
}
check_domain 1 change
{
  "name": "check_domain",
  "description": "Check whether a host (or a list of up to 20) is in the phishunt active phishing feed, by exact host membership (a listed subdomain under an apex is reported separately and does not count as the apex being listed). Misses are also checked against phishunt's archive via /api/v1/analyze (max 3 per call) and report 'previously detected on <date>' only when the archived row's verdict is medium, high or critical (a low/noise archive row is reported as a low-signal candidate, not a detection); that loo",
  "inputSchema": {
    "type": "object",
    "required": [
      "domain"
    ],
    "properties": {
      "fuzzy": {
        "type": "boolean",
        "description": "Legacy mode: case-insensitive substring match against the full URL instead of exact host match. Default false."
      },
      "domain": {
        "type": [
          "string",
          "array"
        ],
        "items": {
          "type": "string"
        },
        "maxItems": 20,
        "description": "A hostname (e.g. 'fake-bank.com') or full URL (the host is extracted), or a list of up to 20. Exact host match plus the 'www.' variant."
      }
    }
  },
  "annotations": {
    "readOnlyHint": true
  }
}

Get alerted

Get an email or webhook when this server's readiness drops by 10+ points, tool-poisoning text appears, or a tool breaks:

curl -X POST https://glimind.com/v1/subscriptions -H 'content-type: application/json' -d '{"tools":["mcp-registry/io.github.0xdaniellopez/phishunt"],"email":"[email protected]"}'

Agents: watch_tool({"toolId": "mcp-registry/io.github.0xdaniellopez/phishunt"}) over MCP.

Passed

Largest tool definitions

Static checks of the advertised tools/list (schema, descriptions, annotations, tool-poisoning patterns, names, size) plus observed protocol, uptime, latency and contract changes. Read-only: no tool is ever called. Weights: schema 15, docs 20, safety 15, efficiency 15, compatibility 15, protocol 5, reliability 10, stability 5. Token counts are estimates (~3.6 characters per token).

Operator? Fix these, then re-check live. Embed the readiness badge:

Markdown
[![MCP agent-readiness](https://glimind.com/v1/readiness/badge/mcp-registry%2Fio.github.0xdaniellopez%2Fphishunt.svg)](https://glimind.com/server/mcp-registry%2Fio.github.0xdaniellopez%2Fphishunt?ref=badge)
HTML
<a href="https://glimind.com/server/mcp-registry%2Fio.github.0xdaniellopez%2Fphishunt?ref=badge"><img src="https://glimind.com/v1/readiness/badge/mcp-registry%2Fio.github.0xdaniellopez%2Fphishunt.svg" alt="MCP agent-readiness"></a>
reStructuredText
.. image:: https://glimind.com/v1/readiness/badge/mcp-registry%2Fio.github.0xdaniellopez%2Fphishunt.svg
   :target: https://glimind.com/server/mcp-registry%2Fio.github.0xdaniellopez%2Fphishunt?ref=badge
   :alt: MCP agent-readiness

Tool-definition log

Glimind records every version of this server's tool definitions in a signed, append-only transparency log. Current manifest sha256:851532915e4a0395…, first seen 2026-10-17, included at leaf 3791 of 66,676. Version history · verify what your client received.

Tools (11)

Compare: most reliable security servers · most reliable web servers

Know before your agent calls it

Glimind tells agents whether a server is up right now and how to call it, then fails over to a live alternative when it isn't.

Add Glimind — free, no signup:

Add to Cursor Add to VS Code

Claude Code

claude mcp add --transport http glimind https://glimind.com/mcp

Claude Desktop · Windsurf · Cline (mcpServers JSON)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "glimind": {
      "type": "http",
      "url": "https://glimind.com/mcp"
    }
  }
}

FAQ

Is the 0xdaniellopez Phishunt MCP server down right now?

As of 2026-10-25 14:19 UTC, the 0xdaniellopez Phishunt MCP server is up with a Glimind reliability score of 100/100 (grade A). Over the last 30 days it answered 100% of Glimind's liveness checks.

How many tools does 0xdaniellopez Phishunt MCP server provide?

0xdaniellopez Phishunt MCP server advertises 11 tools, including analyze_url, analyze_url_deep, check_domain, get_brand_metadata, get_campaign.

How do I install 0xdaniellopez Phishunt MCP server?

Point your MCP client at this streamable-http endpoint: https://mcp.phishunt.io/

Is the 0xdaniellopez Phishunt MCP server safe to connect to an AI agent?

Glimind scanned all 11 tool definitions for tool-poisoning patterns — hidden or invisible characters, instructions that override the model, concealment from the user, requests to read credential or MCP config files, conversation exfiltration and cross-tool shadowing — and found none. This checks what the server tells the model, not what its code does; review the source before granting access to sensitive data.

Operator of 0xdaniellopez Phishunt MCP server?

Status page: 90-day uptime, every outage and how long it lasted.

Claim this listing to get the Verified operator marker, a remediation checklist and owner analytics, or embed the live badge from any of the tool pages above. Maintainers: alerts, deploy attestation and monthly reports.

Status is an automated estimate from Glimind's liveness checks (handshake and tool listing only; no tool is ever called) and may lag or differ from your network. Glimind is not affiliated with this server or its operator. Operator? Request a correction or opt out at https://glimind.com/opt-out.

Feedback
Help us improve