Is the Chainhelix Intel MCP server down?

mcp-registry/io.chainhelix/intel · v1.1.0

healthy
Last checked 2026-10-18 23:14 UTC · handshake 752ms

As of 2026-10-18 23:14 UTC, the Chainhelix Intel MCP server is up with a Glimind reliability score of 93/100 (grade A). Over the last 30 days it answered 100% of Glimind's liveness checks. It had 2 outages in 90 days, with a median recovery of 6 minutes.

uptime (30d checks)
100%
checks observed
3,736
outages (90d)
2
tools
82

Nine chain onchain intelligence with a verifiable onchain signal attestation stream

Install Chainhelix Intel MCP server

Add to Cursor Add to VS Code

Claude Code

claude mcp add --transport http chainhelix-intel-mcp-server https://mcp.chainhelix.io

Claude Desktop · Windsurf · Cline (mcpServers JSON)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "chainhelix-intel-mcp-server": {
      "type": "http",
      "url": "https://mcp.chainhelix.io"
    }
  }
}

Third-party server, listed as discovered. Review its source before installing.

Agent-readiness: D (60/100)

D (60/100): 0 error(s), 6 warning(s) across 82 tool(s); ~20,830 tokens of tool definitions.
Scores higher than 0% of 15,339 MCP servers Glimind has audited.
Its tool list costs an agent ~20,830 tokens per session — more than 95% of servers.
60 → 60 since 2026-10-17
no tool-poisoning patterns
Schemas100
Descriptions40
Safety hints16
Token cost35
Client compatibility100
Protocol100
Reliability85
Stability20

What to fix (7)

82 of 82 tool(s) carry no readOnlyHint/destructiveHint annotations.

Annotate read-only tools with {"readOnlyHint": true}. Agents and gateways can then run them without a confirmation prompt, and route around destructive ones. How to fix →

Tools: agent_report, agent_standing, attest, attest_spec, attest_status and 77 more

82 tools on one server. Tool-selection accuracy drops as the menu grows, and some clients (e.g. Cursor) cap the number of active tools.

Group tools by task into smaller servers or toolsets, and merge near-duplicates behind one tool with a mode parameter. How to fix →

110 parameter(s) across 59 tool(s) have no description.

Add a "description" to each parameter with its format and an example ("ISO 8601 date, e.g. 2026-10-17"). This is the commonest cause of wrong arguments on the first call. How to fix →

Tools: agent_report, attest, attest_status, bridge_flows, btc_mempool_history and 54 more

4 tool(s) look like they change state (create/send/delete/pay…) but declare no destructiveHint.

Set annotations {"readOnlyHint": false, "destructiveHint": true|false, "idempotentHint": …}. Clients use these to ask the user before a side effect and to auto-approve safe reads. How to fix →

Tools: buy_key, buyer_clearance, cleared_buyer, screened_payer

Loading this server's tool list costs an agent ~20,830 tokens before any work — more than 95% of MCP servers.

Split rarely-used tools into a separate server or a toolset the client can enable, or expose one "search tools" entry point. Many agents load every connected server's tools into every request. How to fix →

Handshake + tools/list takes ~2,215 ms.

Serve tools/list from memory, keep the process warm, and host close to your users. Every new agent session pays this before its first call.

In the last 30 days: 0 tool(s) removed and 564 schema change(s).

Add new tools or optional parameters instead of renaming or removing; deprecate first (say so in the description) and remove later. Agents cache tool contracts. How to fix →

Auto-fix: 16 corrected tool definitions

Paste-ready definitions with the problems above fixed. Changes marked verify need a human look. 59 tool(s) still need parameter descriptions written by someone who knows the API. All of them as JSON: /v1/readiness/mcp-registry%2Fio.chainhelix%2Fintel/fixes

attest_status 1 change
{
  "name": "attest_status",
  "description": "Check one sealed claim by tenant plus seq or hash. Before reveal time only the receipt shows; after it the claim text and salt are included. With a nonce it returns the receipt of a paid answer instead: the sha256 of the answer bytes, its sequence number and, once sealed, the opBNB batch transaction and Merkle path",
  "inputSchema": {
    "type": "object",
    "x-vocab": {
      "seq": "agent.seq",
      "hash": "onchain.hashApi",
      "nonce": "agent.nonce",
      "tenant": "agent.tenant"
    },
    "required": [
      "tenant"
    ],
    "x-lexicon": {
      "name": "ChainHelix Agentic Lexicon",
      "spec": "lexicon_spec",
      "resolve": "lexicon_resolve",
      "version": "0.2.0",
      "bundleSha256": "25cc80db6d8e9eac73d47a50f7ad6333a21f1972d008a8fed0159de8bfb4b519"
    },
    "properties": {
      "seq": {
        "type": "number"
      },
      "hash": {
        "type": "string"
      },
      "nonce": {
        "type": "string"
      },
      "tenant": {
        "type": "string"
      }
    },
    "additionalProperties": false
  },
  "annotations": {
    "readOnlyHint": true
  }
}
attestation_stats 1 change
{
  "name": "attestation_stats",
  "description": "Live counts of the attestation stream: committed, anchored, revealed, gaps",
  "inputSchema": {
    "type": "object",
    "x-vocab": {},
    "x-lexicon": {
      "name": "ChainHelix Agentic Lexicon",
      "spec": "lexicon_spec",
      "resolve": "lexicon_resolve",
      "version": "0.2.0",
      "bundleSha256": "25cc80db6d8e9eac73d47a50f7ad6333a21f1972d008a8fed0159de8bfb4b519"
    },
    "properties": {},
    "additionalProperties": false
  },
  "annotations": {
    "readOnlyHint": true
  }
}
buy_key 1 change
{
  "name": "buy_key",
  "description": "API keys are not on sale at the moment: every plan answers \"This plan is not on sale.\" and no order is created. When the sale opens this tool returns a payment address, an exact amount in a stablecoin the chosen chain accepts (ethereum, solana and avalanche: USDC or USDT; bnb: USDC, USDT, USD1 or U; polygon: USDC, USDT or USDC.e; tron: USDT; sui: USDC) and a claim token for the chosen plan and payment chain",
  "inputSchema": {
    "type": "object",
    "x-vocab": {
      "plan": "payment.plan",
      "chain": "onchain.chain",
      "email": "identity.email"
    },
    "required": [
      "plan",
      "chain"
    ],
    "x-aliases": {
      "email": [
        "Email",
        "EMAIL"
      ]
    },
    "x-lexicon": {
      "name": "ChainHelix Agentic Lexicon",
      "spec": "lexicon_spec",
      "resolve": "lexicon_resolve",
      "version": "0.2.0",
      "bundleSha256": "25cc80db6d8e9eac73d47a50f7ad6333a21f1972d008a8fed0159de8bfb4b519"
    },
    "properties": {
      "plan": {
        "enum": [
          "standard",
          "pro",
          "alerts"
        ],
        "type": "string"
      },
      "chain": {
        "enum": [
          "ethereum",
          "solana",
          "bnb",
          "polygon",
          "tron",
          "avalanche",
          "sui"
        ],
        "type": "string"
      },
      "email": {
        "type": "string"
      }
    },
    "additionalProperties": false
  },
  "annotations": {
    "readOnlyHint": false,
    "destructiveHint": false,
    "idempotentHint": false
  }
}

Get alerted

Get an email or webhook when this server's readiness drops by 10+ points, tool-poisoning text appears, or a tool breaks:

curl -X POST https://glimind.com/v1/subscriptions -H 'content-type: application/json' -d '{"tools":["mcp-registry/io.chainhelix/intel"],"email":"[email protected]"}'

Agents: watch_tool({"toolId": "mcp-registry/io.chainhelix/intel"}) over MCP.

Passed

Largest tool definitions

Static checks of the advertised tools/list (schema, descriptions, annotations, tool-poisoning patterns, names, size) plus observed protocol, uptime, latency and contract changes. Read-only: no tool is ever called. Weights: schema 15, docs 20, safety 15, efficiency 15, compatibility 15, protocol 5, reliability 10, stability 5. Token counts are estimates (~3.6 characters per token).

Operator? Fix these, then re-check live. Embed the readiness badge:

Markdown
[![MCP agent-readiness](https://glimind.com/v1/readiness/badge/mcp-registry%2Fio.chainhelix%2Fintel.svg)](https://glimind.com/server/mcp-registry%2Fio.chainhelix%2Fintel?ref=badge)
HTML
<a href="https://glimind.com/server/mcp-registry%2Fio.chainhelix%2Fintel?ref=badge"><img src="https://glimind.com/v1/readiness/badge/mcp-registry%2Fio.chainhelix%2Fintel.svg" alt="MCP agent-readiness"></a>
reStructuredText
.. image:: https://glimind.com/v1/readiness/badge/mcp-registry%2Fio.chainhelix%2Fintel.svg
   :target: https://glimind.com/server/mcp-registry%2Fio.chainhelix%2Fintel?ref=badge
   :alt: MCP agent-readiness

Tool-definition log

Glimind records every version of this server's tool definitions in a signed, append-only transparency log. Current manifest sha256:903896a3083b687c…, first seen 2026-10-18, included at leaf 23723 of 23,749. Version history · verify what your client received.

Tools (82)

Compare: most reliable data servers · most reliable payments servers · most reliable other servers · most reliable knowledge servers · most reliable security servers

Know before your agent calls it

Glimind tells agents whether a server is up right now and how to call it, then fails over to a live alternative when it isn't.

Add Glimind — free, no signup:

Add to Cursor Add to VS Code

Claude Code

claude mcp add --transport http glimind https://glimind.com/mcp

Claude Desktop · Windsurf · Cline (mcpServers JSON)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "glimind": {
      "type": "http",
      "url": "https://glimind.com/mcp"
    }
  }
}

FAQ

Is the Chainhelix Intel MCP server down right now?

As of 2026-10-18 23:14 UTC, the Chainhelix Intel MCP server is up with a Glimind reliability score of 93/100 (grade A). Over the last 30 days it answered 100% of Glimind's liveness checks. It had 2 outages in 90 days, with a median recovery of 6 minutes.

How many tools does Chainhelix Intel MCP server provide?

Chainhelix Intel MCP server advertises 82 tools, including agent_report, agent_standing, attest, attest_spec, attest_status.

How do I install Chainhelix Intel MCP server?

Point your MCP client at this streamable-http endpoint: https://mcp.chainhelix.io

Is the Chainhelix Intel MCP server safe to connect to an AI agent?

Glimind scanned all 82 tool definitions for tool-poisoning patterns — hidden or invisible characters, instructions that override the model, concealment from the user, requests to read credential or MCP config files, conversation exfiltration and cross-tool shadowing — and found none. This checks what the server tells the model, not what its code does; review the source before granting access to sensitive data.

Operator of Chainhelix Intel MCP server?

Status page: 90-day uptime, every outage and how long it lasted.

Claim this listing to get the Verified operator marker, a remediation checklist and owner analytics, or embed the live badge from any of the tool pages above. Maintainers: alerts, deploy attestation and monthly reports.

Status is an automated estimate from Glimind's liveness checks (handshake and tool listing only; no tool is ever called) and may lag or differ from your network. Glimind is not affiliated with this server or its operator. Operator? Request a correction or opt out at https://glimind.com/opt-out.

Feedback
Help us improve