Is the Medigami MCP server down?

mcp-registry/com.medigami/mcp · v1.28.1

healthy
Last checked 2026-10-22 17:50 UTC · handshake 383ms

As of 2026-10-22 17:50 UTC, the Medigami MCP server is up with a Glimind reliability score of 81/100 (grade B). Over the last 30 days it answered 99.7% of Glimind's liveness checks. It had 14 outages in 90 days, with a median recovery of 3 minutes.

uptime (30d checks)
99.7%
checks observed
4,296
outages (90d)
14
tools
87

Medigami: medical bill error scan, denial decoding, appeal deadlines, hospital price lookup

Install Medigami MCP server

Add to Cursor Add to VS Code

Claude Code

claude mcp add --transport http medigami-mcp-server https://mcp.medigami.com/public/mcp

Claude Desktop · Windsurf · Cline (mcpServers JSON)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "medigami-mcp-server": {
      "type": "http",
      "url": "https://mcp.medigami.com/public/mcp"
    }
  }
}

Third-party server, listed as discovered. Review its source before installing.

Agent-readiness: D (69/100)

D (69/100): 0 error(s), 5 warning(s) across 87 tool(s); ~17,777 tokens of tool definitions.
Scores higher than 4% of 15,558 MCP servers Glimind has audited.
Its tool list costs an agent ~17,777 tokens per session — more than 95% of servers.
69 → 69 since 2026-10-17
no tool-poisoning patterns
Schemas100
Descriptions63
Safety hints15
Token cost35
Client compatibility100
Protocol100
Reliability85
Stability100

What to fix (6)

87 tools on one server. Tool-selection accuracy drops as the menu grows, and some clients (e.g. Cursor) cap the number of active tools.

Group tools by task into smaller servers or toolsets, and merge near-duplicates behind one tool with a mode parameter. How to fix →

106 parameter(s) across 34 tool(s) have no description.

Add a "description" to each parameter with its format and an example ("ISO 8601 date, e.g. 2026-10-17"). This is the commonest cause of wrong arguments on the first call. How to fix →

Tools: analyze_glp1_pathways, appeal_argument_generator, appeal_success_predictor, batch_scan_bills, billing_charge_vs_allowed_delta and 29 more

5 tool(s) look like they change state (create/send/delete/pay…) but declare no destructiveHint.

Set annotations {"readOnlyHint": false, "destructiveHint": true|false, "idempotentHint": …}. Clients use these to ask the user before a side effect and to auto-approve safe reads. How to fix →

Tools: billing_charge_vs_allowed_delta, payer_specific_appeal_templates, payment_plan_optimizer, settlement_optimizer, submit_denial_letter

Loading this server's tool list costs an agent ~17,777 tokens before any work — more than 95% of MCP servers.

Split rarely-used tools into a separate server or a toolset the client can enable, or expose one "search tools" entry point. Many agents load every connected server's tools into every request. How to fix →

Handshake + tools/list takes ~1,556 ms.

Serve tools/list from memory, keep the process warm, and host close to your users. Every new agent session pays this before its first call.

83 of 87 tool(s) carry no readOnlyHint/destructiveHint annotations.

Annotate read-only tools with {"readOnlyHint": true}. Agents and gateways can then run them without a confirmation prompt, and route around destructive ones. How to fix →

Tools: analyze_glp1_pathways, appeal_argument_generator, appeal_escalation_path_finder, appeal_success_predictor, batch_scan_bills and 78 more

Auto-fix: 24 corrected tool definitions

Paste-ready definitions with the problems above fixed. Changes marked verify need a human look. 34 tool(s) still need parameter descriptions written by someone who knows the API. All of them as JSON: /v1/readiness/mcp-registry%2Fcom.medigami%2Fmcp/fixes

analyze_glp1_pathways 1 change
{
  "name": "analyze_glp1_pathways",
  "description": "Find all access pathways for a GLP-1 drug (Ozempic, Wegovy, Mounjaro, Zepbound) given patient eligibility factors. Ranks pathways by monthly cost, flags prior-authorization rules and step-therapy, and returns the recommended appeal strategy if denial is likely.\n\nWHEN TO USE: User specifically asks about GLP-1 drugs (Ozempic, Wegovy, Mounjaro, Zepbound) — coverage, prior-auth strategy, step-therapy alternatives.\n\nWHEN NOT: For non-GLP-1 prescriptions (use optimize_prescription).",
  "inputSchema": {
    "type": "object",
    "required": [
      "insurer",
      "bmi"
    ],
    "properties": {
      "bmi": {
        "type": "number"
      },
      "state": {
        "type": "string"
      },
      "has_cvd": {
        "type": "boolean"
      },
      "insurer": {
        "type": "string"
      },
      "medicare": {
        "type": "boolean"
      },
      "has_diabetes": {
        "type": "boolean"
      },
      "current_copay": {
        "type": "number"
      },
      "tried_step_therapy": {
        "type": "array",
        "items": {
          "type": "string"
        },
        "description": "Drug names already tried under step therapy, e.g. ['metformin']."
      }
    }
  },
  "annotations": {
    "readOnlyHint": true
  }
}
appeal_escalation_path_finder 1 change
{
  "name": "appeal_escalation_path_finder",
  "description": "[Taxonomy VII.129 — baseline response (public data only)] Find the correct escalation path for a denied claim (internal appeal → external review → DOI).\n\nWHEN TO USE: User needs to know the deadlines and agencies for each step of appealing a denial. Pass state (e.g. 'CA') and insurer for state-specific and insurer-specific values.\n\nWHEN NOT: Without state/insurer — still works but returns generic federal defaults. Follow up with state for best answer.\n\nEXAMPLES:\n- CA / UnitedHealthcare escalatio",
  "inputSchema": {
    "type": "object",
    "properties": {
      "state": {
        "type": "string",
        "description": "Two-letter US state code. State-specific external-review deadlines and DOI agency URL are returned when we have them (top 16 states)."
      },
      "insurer": {
        "type": "string",
        "description": "Insurer canonical name, e.g. 'UnitedHealthcare', 'Aetna'. Used to look up payer-specific appeal windows."
      }
    }
  },
  "annotations": {
    "readOnlyHint": true
  }
}
billing_charge_vs_allowed_delta 1 change
{
  "name": "billing_charge_vs_allowed_delta",
  "description": "[Taxonomy III.51 — baseline response (public data only)] Delta between billed charge and payer-allowed amount for a claim line.\n\nWHEN TO USE: User wants to understand what a service typically costs, compare prices across regions/providers, or gauge whether a billed amount is reasonable.\n\nWHEN NOT: For a specific bill they have in hand, scan_bill_for_errors is more actionable. For insurance-path estimates, use deductible_impact_calculator or coinsurance_simulator.",
  "inputSchema": {
    "type": "object",
    "required": [
      "billed_usd",
      "allowed_usd"
    ],
    "properties": {
      "billed_usd": {
        "type": "number"
      },
      "allowed_usd": {
        "type": "number"
      }
    }
  },
  "annotations": {
    "readOnlyHint": false,
    "destructiveHint": false,
    "idempotentHint": false
  }
}

Get alerted

Get an email or webhook when this server's readiness drops by 10+ points, tool-poisoning text appears, or a tool breaks:

curl -X POST https://glimind.com/v1/subscriptions -H 'content-type: application/json' -d '{"tools":["mcp-registry/com.medigami/mcp"],"email":"[email protected]"}'

Agents: watch_tool({"toolId": "mcp-registry/com.medigami/mcp"}) over MCP.

Passed

Largest tool definitions

Static checks of the advertised tools/list (schema, descriptions, annotations, tool-poisoning patterns, names, size) plus observed protocol, uptime, latency and contract changes. Read-only: no tool is ever called. Weights: schema 15, docs 20, safety 15, efficiency 15, compatibility 15, protocol 5, reliability 10, stability 5. Token counts are estimates (~3.6 characters per token).

Operator? Fix these, then re-check live. Embed the readiness badge:

Markdown
[![MCP agent-readiness](https://glimind.com/v1/readiness/badge/mcp-registry%2Fcom.medigami%2Fmcp.svg)](https://glimind.com/server/mcp-registry%2Fcom.medigami%2Fmcp?ref=badge)
HTML
<a href="https://glimind.com/server/mcp-registry%2Fcom.medigami%2Fmcp?ref=badge"><img src="https://glimind.com/v1/readiness/badge/mcp-registry%2Fcom.medigami%2Fmcp.svg" alt="MCP agent-readiness"></a>
reStructuredText
.. image:: https://glimind.com/v1/readiness/badge/mcp-registry%2Fcom.medigami%2Fmcp.svg
   :target: https://glimind.com/server/mcp-registry%2Fcom.medigami%2Fmcp?ref=badge
   :alt: MCP agent-readiness

Tool-definition log

Glimind records every version of this server's tool definitions in a signed, append-only transparency log. Current manifest sha256:9db741af4864532f…, first seen 2026-10-17, included at leaf 15209 of 47,320. Version history · verify what your client received.

Tools (87)

Compare: most reliable data servers · most reliable knowledge servers · most reliable ml servers · most reliable finance servers · most reliable other servers

Know before your agent calls it

Glimind tells agents whether a server is up right now and how to call it, then fails over to a live alternative when it isn't.

Add Glimind — free, no signup:

Add to Cursor Add to VS Code

Claude Code

claude mcp add --transport http glimind https://glimind.com/mcp

Claude Desktop · Windsurf · Cline (mcpServers JSON)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "glimind": {
      "type": "http",
      "url": "https://glimind.com/mcp"
    }
  }
}

FAQ

Is the Medigami MCP server down right now?

As of 2026-10-22 17:50 UTC, the Medigami MCP server is up with a Glimind reliability score of 81/100 (grade B). Over the last 30 days it answered 99.7% of Glimind's liveness checks. It had 14 outages in 90 days, with a median recovery of 3 minutes.

How many tools does Medigami MCP server provide?

Medigami MCP server advertises 87 tools, including analyze_glp1_pathways, appeal_argument_generator, appeal_escalation_path_finder, appeal_success_predictor, batch_scan_bills.

How do I install Medigami MCP server?

Point your MCP client at this streamable-http endpoint: https://mcp.medigami.com/public/mcp

Is the Medigami MCP server safe to connect to an AI agent?

Glimind scanned all 87 tool definitions for tool-poisoning patterns — hidden or invisible characters, instructions that override the model, concealment from the user, requests to read credential or MCP config files, conversation exfiltration and cross-tool shadowing — and found none. This checks what the server tells the model, not what its code does; review the source before granting access to sensitive data.

Operator of Medigami MCP server?

Status page: 90-day uptime, every outage and how long it lasted.

Claim this listing to get the Verified operator marker, a remediation checklist and owner analytics, or embed the live badge from any of the tool pages above. Maintainers: alerts, deploy attestation and monthly reports.

Status is an automated estimate from Glimind's liveness checks (handshake and tool listing only; no tool is ever called) and may lag or differ from your network. Glimind is not affiliated with this server or its operator. Operator? Request a correction or opt out at https://glimind.com/opt-out.

Feedback
Help us improve