Is the Layercall Trust Api MCP server down?

mcp-registry/com.layercall/trust-api · v1.0.0

healthy
Last checked 2026-10-25 09:23 UTC · handshake 274ms

As of 2026-10-25 09:23 UTC, the Layercall Trust Api MCP server is up with a Glimind reliability score of 97/100 (grade A). Over the last 30 days it answered 100% of Glimind's liveness checks.

uptime (30d checks)
100%
checks observed
4,731
outages (90d)
0
tools
7

Score an IP, email, phone, domain or device for fraud in one call, with the signals behind it.

Install Layercall Trust Api MCP server

Add to Cursor Add to VS Code

Claude Code

claude mcp add --transport http layercall-trust-api-mcp-server https://www.layercall.com/api/mcp

Claude Desktop · Windsurf · Cline (mcpServers JSON)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "layercall-trust-api-mcp-server": {
      "type": "http",
      "url": "https://www.layercall.com/api/mcp"
    }
  }
}

Third-party server, listed as discovered. Review its source before installing.

Agent-readiness: C (77/100)

C (77/100): 0 error(s), 2 warning(s) across 7 tool(s); ~1,208 tokens of tool definitions.
Scores higher than 13% of 15,682 MCP servers Glimind has audited.
Its tool list costs an agent ~1,208 tokens per session — lighter than 70% of servers.
76 → 77 since 2026-10-17
no tool-poisoning patterns
Schemas100
Descriptions60
Safety hints30
Token cost100
Client compatibility70
Protocol100
Reliability100
Stability100

What to fix (3)

7 of 7 tool(s) carry no readOnlyHint/destructiveHint annotations.

Annotate read-only tools with {"readOnlyHint": true}. Agents and gateways can then run them without a confirmation prompt, and route around destructive ones. How to fix →

Tools: lookup_phone, score_device, score_domain, score_ip, score_user and 2 more

6 parameter(s) across 3 tool(s) have no description.

Add a "description" to each parameter with its format and an example ("ISO 8601 date, e.g. 2026-10-17"). This is the commonest cause of wrong arguments on the first call. How to fix →

Tools: lookup_phone, score_user, verify_email

No tool declares an outputSchema.

Declare outputSchema and return structuredContent (MCP 2025-06-18+). Agents can then parse results without guessing, and chain tools reliably. How to fix →

Auto-fix: 3 corrected tool definitions

Paste-ready definitions with the problems above fixed. Changes marked verify need a human look. 3 tool(s) still need parameter descriptions written by someone who knows the API. All of them as JSON: /v1/readiness/mcp-registry%2Fcom.layercall%2Ftrust-api/fixes

lookup_phone 1 change
{
  "name": "lookup_phone",
  "description": "Validate a phone number worldwide against its national numbering plan. Returns E.164, country, line type (mobile/fixed/VoIP/toll-free/premium) and a risk score. Works globally, not US-only.",
  "inputSchema": {
    "type": "object",
    "required": [
      "phone"
    ],
    "properties": {
      "phone": {
        "type": "string",
        "description": "Number in international form (+14155552671) or national form with country set"
      },
      "country": {
        "type": "string",
        "description": "ISO 3166-1 alpha-2, required only for national-format numbers"
      },
      "strictness": {
        "type": "integer",
        "maximum": 3,
        "minimum": 0
      }
    }
  },
  "annotations": {
    "readOnlyHint": true
  },
  "title": "Validate a phone number"
}
score_ip 1 change
{
  "name": "score_ip",
  "description": "Risk-score an IPv4 or IPv6 address. Detects commercial VPNs (naming the provider where its own published list confirms it), proxies, Tor exit nodes and datacenter hosting, and returns geolocation, ASN and a 0-100 risk score with an allow/review/block verdict.",
  "inputSchema": {
    "type": "object",
    "required": [
      "ip"
    ],
    "properties": {
      "ip": {
        "type": "string",
        "description": "IPv4 or IPv6 address, e.g. 8.8.8.8"
      },
      "strictness": {
        "type": "integer",
        "maximum": 3,
        "minimum": 0,
        "description": "0 lenient, 1 balanced (default), 2 strict, 3 paranoid. Moves the verdict thresholds only; the score is unchanged."
      }
    }
  },
  "annotations": {
    "readOnlyHint": false,
    "destructiveHint": false,
    "idempotentHint": false
  },
  "title": "Score an IP address"
}
verify_email 1 change
{
  "name": "verify_email",
  "description": "Check an email for syntax, MX records, disposable/throwaway providers, role accounts (info@, admin@), homograph lookalikes and domain age. Returns a 0-100 risk score and an allow/review/block verdict.",
  "inputSchema": {
    "type": "object",
    "required": [
      "email"
    ],
    "properties": {
      "email": {
        "type": "string",
        "description": "Full email address"
      },
      "strictness": {
        "type": "integer",
        "maximum": 3,
        "minimum": 0
      }
    }
  },
  "annotations": {
    "readOnlyHint": false,
    "destructiveHint": false,
    "idempotentHint": false
  },
  "title": "Verify an email address"
}

Get alerted

Get an email or webhook when this server's readiness drops by 10+ points, tool-poisoning text appears, or a tool breaks:

curl -X POST https://glimind.com/v1/subscriptions -H 'content-type: application/json' -d '{"tools":["mcp-registry/com.layercall/trust-api"],"email":"[email protected]"}'

Agents: watch_tool({"toolId": "mcp-registry/com.layercall/trust-api"}) over MCP.

Passed

Largest tool definitions

Static checks of the advertised tools/list (schema, descriptions, annotations, tool-poisoning patterns, names, size) plus observed protocol, uptime, latency and contract changes. Read-only: no tool is ever called. Weights: schema 15, docs 20, safety 15, efficiency 15, compatibility 15, protocol 5, reliability 10, stability 5. Token counts are estimates (~3.6 characters per token).

Operator? Fix these, then re-check live. Embed the readiness badge:

Markdown
[![MCP agent-readiness](https://glimind.com/v1/readiness/badge/mcp-registry%2Fcom.layercall%2Ftrust-api.svg)](https://glimind.com/server/mcp-registry%2Fcom.layercall%2Ftrust-api?ref=badge)
HTML
<a href="https://glimind.com/server/mcp-registry%2Fcom.layercall%2Ftrust-api?ref=badge"><img src="https://glimind.com/v1/readiness/badge/mcp-registry%2Fcom.layercall%2Ftrust-api.svg" alt="MCP agent-readiness"></a>
reStructuredText
.. image:: https://glimind.com/v1/readiness/badge/mcp-registry%2Fcom.layercall%2Ftrust-api.svg
   :target: https://glimind.com/server/mcp-registry%2Fcom.layercall%2Ftrust-api?ref=badge
   :alt: MCP agent-readiness

Tool-definition log

Glimind records every version of this server's tool definitions in a signed, append-only transparency log. Current manifest sha256:2d4ce6471a83db9e…, first seen 2026-10-17, included at leaf 9368 of 65,111. Version history · verify what your client received.

Tools (7)

Compare: most reliable other servers · most reliable security servers · most reliable email servers

Know before your agent calls it

Glimind tells agents whether a server is up right now and how to call it, then fails over to a live alternative when it isn't.

Add Glimind — free, no signup:

Add to Cursor Add to VS Code

Claude Code

claude mcp add --transport http glimind https://glimind.com/mcp

Claude Desktop · Windsurf · Cline (mcpServers JSON)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "glimind": {
      "type": "http",
      "url": "https://glimind.com/mcp"
    }
  }
}

FAQ

Is the Layercall Trust Api MCP server down right now?

As of 2026-10-25 09:23 UTC, the Layercall Trust Api MCP server is up with a Glimind reliability score of 97/100 (grade A). Over the last 30 days it answered 100% of Glimind's liveness checks.

How many tools does Layercall Trust Api MCP server provide?

Layercall Trust Api MCP server advertises 7 tools, including lookup_phone, score_device, score_domain, score_ip, score_user.

How do I install Layercall Trust Api MCP server?

Point your MCP client at this streamable-http endpoint: https://www.layercall.com/api/mcp

Is the Layercall Trust Api MCP server safe to connect to an AI agent?

Glimind scanned all 7 tool definitions for tool-poisoning patterns — hidden or invisible characters, instructions that override the model, concealment from the user, requests to read credential or MCP config files, conversation exfiltration and cross-tool shadowing — and found none. This checks what the server tells the model, not what its code does; review the source before granting access to sensitive data.

Operator of Layercall Trust Api MCP server?

Status page: 90-day uptime, every outage and how long it lasted.

Claim this listing to get the Verified operator marker, a remediation checklist and owner analytics, or embed the live badge from any of the tool pages above. Maintainers: alerts, deploy attestation and monthly reports.

Status is an automated estimate from Glimind's liveness checks (handshake and tool listing only; no tool is ever called) and may lag or differ from your network. Glimind is not affiliated with this server or its operator. Operator? Request a correction or opt out at https://glimind.com/opt-out.

Feedback
Help us improve