Is the Emergentphysicslab Waveguard MCP server down?

mcp-registry/com.emergentphysicslab/waveguard · v3.3.0

healthy
Last checked 2026-10-21 01:53 UTC · handshake 5.3s

As of 2026-10-21 01:53 UTC, the Emergentphysicslab Waveguard MCP server is up with a Glimind reliability score of 51/100 (grade D). Over the last 30 days it answered 94.2% of Glimind's liveness checks. It had 869 outages in 90 days, with a median recovery of 4 minutes.

uptime (30d checks)
94.2%
checks observed
3,996
outages (90d)
869
tools
19

Anomaly detection API powered by physics simulation. Scan any data for outliers.

Install Emergentphysicslab Waveguard MCP server

Add to Cursor Add to VS Code

Claude Code

claude mcp add --transport http emergentphysicslab-waveguard-mcp-server https://gpartin--waveguard-api-fastapi-app.modal.run/v2/mcp

Claude Desktop · Windsurf · Cline (mcpServers JSON)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "emergentphysicslab-waveguard-mcp-server": {
      "type": "http",
      "url": "https://gpartin--waveguard-api-fastapi-app.modal.run/v2/mcp"
    }
  }
}

Third-party server, listed as discovered. Review its source before installing.

Agent-readiness: B (81/100)

B (81/100): 1 error(s), 3 warning(s) across 19 tool(s); ~5,089 tokens of tool definitions.
Scores higher than 36% of 15,449 MCP servers Glimind has audited.
Its tool list costs an agent ~5,089 tokens per session — more than 60% of servers.
81 → 81 since 2026-10-17
no tool-poisoning patterns
Schemas79
Descriptions100
Safety hints100
Token cost100
Client compatibility70
Protocol40
Reliability20
Stability100

What to fix (5)

Reachable 94.2% of the time over the last 30 days; median recovery 4 min.

Agents fail over to an alternative the first time a call fails. Add health checks and restart-on-failure, and avoid cold starts on serverless hosts.

4 tool(s) have parameters with no type (no type/enum/anyOf/$ref).

Give every parameter a "type" (or "enum"/"anyOf"). Untyped parameters make models guess — strings for numbers, objects for arrays. How to fix →

Tools: waveguard_compare, waveguard_counterfactual, waveguard_fingerprint, waveguard_mechanism_probe

Negotiates MCP 2024-11-05. Structured output, tool output schemas and elicitation arrived in 2025-06-18.

Upgrade the MCP SDK and negotiate 2025-06-18 or newer. How to fix →

Handshake + tools/list takes ~5,217 ms.

Serve tools/list from memory, keep the process warm, and host close to your users. Every new agent session pays this before its first call.

No tool declares an outputSchema.

Declare outputSchema and return structuredContent (MCP 2025-06-18+). Agents can then parse results without guessing, and chain tools reliably. How to fix →

Auto-fix: 4 corrected tool definitions

Paste-ready definitions with the problems above fixed. Changes marked verify need a human look. All of them as JSON: /v1/readiness/mcp-registry%2Fcom.emergentphysicslab%2Fwaveguard/fixes

waveguard_compare 1 change
{
  "name": "waveguard_compare",
  "description": "Compare two data items for structural similarity using physics-based fingerprints. Returns cosine similarity (0–1) and Euclidean distance. Use for duplicate detection, behavioral matching, drift analysis, or checking if two tokens/wallets/contracts are structurally similar.\n\nCosine similarity > 0.95 = very similar. < 0.80 = structurally different.",
  "inputSchema": {
    "type": "object",
    "required": [
      "data_a",
      "data_b"
    ],
    "properties": {
      "data_a": {
        "description": "First data item to compare.",
        "type": "string"
      },
      "data_b": {
        "description": "Second data item to compare (same type as data_a).",
        "type": "string"
      },
      "encoder_type": {
        "enum": [
          "json",
          "numeric",
          "text",
          "timeseries",
          "tabular"
        ],
        "type": "string",
        "description": "Data encoder. Omit to auto-detect."
      }
    }
  },
  "annotations": {
    "title": "Compare Data Similarity",
    "readOnlyHint": true,
    "openWorldHint": true,
    "idempotentHint": true,
    "destructiveHint": false
  }
}
waveguard_counterfactual 1 change
{
  "name": "waveguard_counterfactual",
  "description": "Run baseline plus counterfactual variants and measure verdict/score sensitivity.",
  "inputSchema": {
    "type": "object",
    "required": [
      "training",
      "base_test",
      "counterfactual_tests"
    ],
    "properties": {
      "training": {
        "type": "array",
        "minItems": 2,
        "description": "2+ baseline normal samples used to build the reference profile."
      },
      "base_test": {
        "description": "Baseline candidate sample to evaluate before counterfactual perturbations.",
        "type": "string"
      },
      "field_level": {
        "enum": [
          0,
          1
        ],
        "type": "integer",
        "description": "0 = real scalar field (faster), 1 = complex field (richer phase dynamics)."
      },
      "sensitivity": {
        "type": "number",
        "description": "Anomaly sensitivity multiplier (default: 1.0). Higher values flag more aggressively."
      },
      "encoder_type": {
        "type": "string",
        "description": "Optional encoder override. Omit to auto-detect from input structure."
      },
      "counterfactual_tests": {
        "type": "array",
        "minItems": 1,
        "description": "1+ perturbed variants of base_test for sensitivity analysis."
      }
    }
  },
  "annotations": {
    "title": "Counterfactual Analysis",
    "readOnlyHint": true,
    "openWorldHint": true,
    "idempotentHint": true,
    "destructiveHint": false
  }
}
waveguard_fingerprint 1 change
{
  "name": "waveguard_fingerprint",
  "description": "Get a physics embedding of any data item (52-dim at Level 0, 62-dim at Level 1 with phase statistics). The fingerprint captures structural properties via wave-equation dynamics — useful for similarity search, clustering, baseline comparison, and drift detection. Works on JSON objects, token metrics, wallet activity, trading data, or any structured data.\n\nReturns a deterministic vector with labeled dimensions (chi statistics, energy distribution, gradient patterns, and phase coherence at Level 1)",
  "inputSchema": {
    "type": "object",
    "required": [
      "data"
    ],
    "properties": {
      "data": {
        "description": "Any data item to fingerprint: JSON object, numeric array, string, or structured record.",
        "type": "string"
      },
      "field_level": {
        "enum": [
          0,
          1
        ],
        "type": "integer",
        "description": "0 = real scalar 52-dim (default), 1 = complex field 62-dim."
      },
      "encoder_type": {
        "enum": [
          "json",
          "numeric",
          "text",
          "timeseries",
          "tabular",
          "complex_numeric"
        ],
        "type": "string",
        "description": "Data encoder. Omit to auto-detect."
      }
    }
  },
  "annotations": {
    "title": "Physics Fingerprint",
    "readOnlyHint": true,
    "openWorldHint": true,
    "idempotentHint": true,
    "destructiveHint": false
  }
}

Get alerted

Get an email or webhook when this server's readiness drops by 10+ points, tool-poisoning text appears, or a tool breaks:

curl -X POST https://glimind.com/v1/subscriptions -H 'content-type: application/json' -d '{"tools":["mcp-registry/com.emergentphysicslab/waveguard"],"email":"[email protected]"}'

Agents: watch_tool({"toolId": "mcp-registry/com.emergentphysicslab/waveguard"}) over MCP.

Passed

Largest tool definitions

Static checks of the advertised tools/list (schema, descriptions, annotations, tool-poisoning patterns, names, size) plus observed protocol, uptime, latency and contract changes. Read-only: no tool is ever called. Weights: schema 15, docs 20, safety 15, efficiency 15, compatibility 15, protocol 5, reliability 10, stability 5. Token counts are estimates (~3.6 characters per token).

Operator? Fix these, then re-check live. Embed the readiness badge:

Markdown
[![MCP agent-readiness](https://glimind.com/v1/readiness/badge/mcp-registry%2Fcom.emergentphysicslab%2Fwaveguard.svg)](https://glimind.com/server/mcp-registry%2Fcom.emergentphysicslab%2Fwaveguard?ref=badge)
HTML
<a href="https://glimind.com/server/mcp-registry%2Fcom.emergentphysicslab%2Fwaveguard?ref=badge"><img src="https://glimind.com/v1/readiness/badge/mcp-registry%2Fcom.emergentphysicslab%2Fwaveguard.svg" alt="MCP agent-readiness"></a>
reStructuredText
.. image:: https://glimind.com/v1/readiness/badge/mcp-registry%2Fcom.emergentphysicslab%2Fwaveguard.svg
   :target: https://glimind.com/server/mcp-registry%2Fcom.emergentphysicslab%2Fwaveguard?ref=badge
   :alt: MCP agent-readiness

Tool-definition log

Glimind records every version of this server's tool definitions in a signed, append-only transparency log. Current manifest sha256:9dd68b7d10415bc1…, first seen 2026-10-17, included at leaf 4965 of 36,451. Version history · verify what your client received.

Tools (19)

Compare: most reliable ml servers · most reliable devops servers · most reliable data servers

Know before your agent calls it

Glimind tells agents whether a server is up right now and how to call it, then fails over to a live alternative when it isn't.

Add Glimind — free, no signup:

Add to Cursor Add to VS Code

Claude Code

claude mcp add --transport http glimind https://glimind.com/mcp

Claude Desktop · Windsurf · Cline (mcpServers JSON)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "glimind": {
      "type": "http",
      "url": "https://glimind.com/mcp"
    }
  }
}

FAQ

Is the Emergentphysicslab Waveguard MCP server down right now?

As of 2026-10-21 01:53 UTC, the Emergentphysicslab Waveguard MCP server is up with a Glimind reliability score of 51/100 (grade D). Over the last 30 days it answered 94.2% of Glimind's liveness checks. It had 869 outages in 90 days, with a median recovery of 4 minutes.

How many tools does Emergentphysicslab Waveguard MCP server provide?

Emergentphysicslab Waveguard MCP server advertises 19 tools, including waveguard_action_surface, waveguard_cascade_risk, waveguard_compare, waveguard_counterfactual, waveguard_fingerprint.

How do I install Emergentphysicslab Waveguard MCP server?

Point your MCP client at this streamable-http endpoint: https://gpartin--waveguard-api-fastapi-app.modal.run/v2/mcp

Is the Emergentphysicslab Waveguard MCP server safe to connect to an AI agent?

Glimind scanned all 19 tool definitions for tool-poisoning patterns — hidden or invisible characters, instructions that override the model, concealment from the user, requests to read credential or MCP config files, conversation exfiltration and cross-tool shadowing — and found none. This checks what the server tells the model, not what its code does; review the source before granting access to sensitive data.

Operator of Emergentphysicslab Waveguard MCP server?

Status page: 90-day uptime, every outage and how long it lasted.

Claim this listing to get the Verified operator marker, a remediation checklist and owner analytics, or embed the live badge from any of the tool pages above. Maintainers: alerts, deploy attestation and monthly reports.

Status is an automated estimate from Glimind's liveness checks (handshake and tool listing only; no tool is ever called) and may lag or differ from your network. Glimind is not affiliated with this server or its operator. Operator? Request a correction or opt out at https://glimind.com/opt-out.

Feedback
Help us improve