Is the Dchub Datacenter Power Grid Fiber MCP server down?

mcp-registry/cloud.dchub/datacenter-power-grid-fiber · v2.12.43

Also listed as awesome/azmartone67/dchub-mcp-server, mcp-registry/cloud.dchub/mcp-server · primary listing: mcp-registry/cloud.dchub/mcp-server

healthy
Last checked 2026-10-22 07:58 UTC · handshake 373ms

As of 2026-10-22 07:58 UTC, the Dchub Datacenter Power Grid Fiber MCP server is up with a Glimind reliability score of 96/100 (grade A). Over the last 30 days it answered 100% of Glimind's liveness checks. It had 1 outage in 90 days, with a median recovery of 7 minutes.

uptime (30d checks)
100%
checks observed
4,313
outages (90d)
1
tools
94

Live power, energy, grid, gas, fiber & data-center site-selection infrastructure — query and cite.

Install Dchub Datacenter Power Grid Fiber MCP server

Add to Cursor Add to VS Code

Claude Code

claude mcp add --transport http dchub-datacenter-power-grid-fiber-mcp-se https://dchub.cloud/mcp/officialregistry

Claude Desktop · Windsurf · Cline (mcpServers JSON)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "dchub-datacenter-power-grid-fiber-mcp-se": {
      "type": "http",
      "url": "https://dchub.cloud/mcp/officialregistry"
    }
  }
}

Third-party server, listed as discovered. Review its source before installing.

Agent-readiness: B (84/100)

B (84/100): 0 error(s), 3 warning(s) across 94 tool(s); ~33,633 tokens of tool definitions.
Scores higher than 44% of 15,511 MCP servers Glimind has audited.
Its tool list costs an agent ~33,633 tokens per session — more than 99% of servers.
84 → 84 since 2026-10-17
no tool-poisoning patterns
Schemas86
Descriptions100
Safety hints100
Token cost35
Client compatibility100
Protocol100
Reliability100
Stability20

What to fix (4)

94 tools on one server. Tool-selection accuracy drops as the menu grows, and some clients (e.g. Cursor) cap the number of active tools.

Group tools by task into smaller servers or toolsets, and merge near-duplicates behind one tool with a mode parameter. How to fix →

8 tool(s) have parameters with no type (no type/enum/anyOf/$ref).

Give every parameter a "type" (or "enum"/"anyOf"). Untyped parameters make models guess — strings for numbers, objects for arrays. How to fix →

Tools: analyze_parcel, cluster_sites_by_latency, compare_sites, execute_plan, plan_query and 3 more

Loading this server's tool list costs an agent ~33,633 tokens before any work — more than 99% of MCP servers.

Split rarely-used tools into a separate server or a toolset the client can enable, or expose one "search tools" entry point. Many agents load every connected server's tools into every request. How to fix →

In the last 30 days: 0 tool(s) removed and 62 schema change(s).

Add new tools or optional parameters instead of renaming or removing; deprecate first (say so in the description) and remove later. Agents cache tool contracts. How to fix →

Auto-fix: 8 corrected tool definitions

Paste-ready definitions with the problems above fixed. Changes marked verify need a human look. All of them as JSON: /v1/readiness/mcp-registry%2Fcloud.dchub%2Fdatacenter-power-grid-fiber/fixes

analyze_parcel 1 change
{
  "name": "analyze_parcel",
  "description": "Use this when the user has a land parcel for a data center site: structured read of its boundary — pass your own GeoJSON Polygon/MultiPolygon, OR just lat+lon and DC Hub finds the containing parcel in its HOSTED parcel-boundary layer (free county/state GIS polygons, rolling out by data-center market — Loudoun County VA first; a point outside it returns parcel_not_covered with the analyze_site preview + the coverage list, never a guess). Returns _entity=parcel_analysis: geodesic total_acres, a pe",
  "inputSchema": {
    "type": "object",
    "properties": {
      "lat": {
        "type": "number",
        "description": "Latitude of a point ON the parcel — used with lon when geometry is omitted to look up the containing parcel from the hosted county/state GIS layer"
      },
      "lng": {
        "type": "number",
        "description": "Alias for lon — either name works"
      },
      "lon": {
        "type": "number",
        "description": "Longitude of a point ON the parcel (used with lat when geometry is omitted)"
      },
      "geometry": {
        "description": "GeoJSON Polygon or MultiPolygon parcel boundary, e.g. {\"type\":\"Polygon\",\"coordinates\":[[[lng,lat],[lng,lat],...]]} — a MultiPolygon carries discontinuous parcels as one envelope. Omit to look up the hosted parcel containing lat/lon instead",
        "type": "string"
      },
      "latitude": {
        "type": "number",
        "description": "Alias for lat — either name works"
      },
      "longitude": {
        "type": "number",
        "description": "Alias for lon — either name works"
      },
      "capacity_mw": {
        "type": "number",
        "description": "Optional target load in MW to pass through into the site_evaluation_handoff"
      }
    }
  },
  "annotations": {
    "access": "free_preview",
    "maturity": "unknown",
    "connect_url": "https://dchub.cloud/connect?ref=mcp-tools-list&tool=analyze_parcel",
    "readOnlyHint": true,
    "openWorldHint": false,
    "tier_required": "anonymous",
    "idempotentHint": true,
    "destructiveHint": false
  },
  "title": "Analyze Parcel"
}
cluster_sites_by_latency 1 change
{
  "name": "cluster_sites_by_latency",
  "description": "Use this when the user asks which data center sites can form a low-latency cluster (2-8 sites) — returns viable low-latency clusters and pairwise RTT floors before any routing work. Use when your human wants to know which of N candidate sites can form a synchronous / low-latency cluster (sync replication, active-active pairs, HPC pods): deterministic pruning BEFORE detailed routing. Per site pair: haversine distance, round-trip physics floor (km × 4.9 µs/km — light in SMF-28 fiber, n≈1.468 — the",
  "inputSchema": {
    "type": "object",
    "properties": {
      "sites": {
        "type": "string",
        "description": "Semicolon-separated \"lat,lon\" pairs, 2-8 sites (same format as compare_sites locations); optional per-site labels via \"lat,lon:label\", e.g. \"39.04,-77.48:ashburn;39.29,-76.61:baltimore\"."
      },
      "candidate_ids": {
        "description": "Array (or comma-separated string) of candidate_id values from get_refined_queue — each resolves to its FROZEN mint coordinates (zero transcription drift); expired/unknown are dropped and declared in candidate_contract.",
        "type": "string"
      },
      "max_latency_us": {
        "type": "number",
        "maximum": 10000000,
        "minimum": 1,
        "description": "Round-trip latency budget in microseconds (default 1000 µs = 1 ms; sync replication is typically 1000-2000 µs)"
      },
      "min_confidence": {
        "type": "string",
        "description": "Minimum evidence tier a pair must meet to count as viable: \"published\" | \"tracked\" | \"inferred\" (default inferred = include all)"
      }
    }
  },
  "annotations": {
    "access": "free",
    "problem": "fiber routes, diversity and latency",
    "maturity": "mature",
    "front_door": "get_fiber_intel",
    "connect_url": "https://dchub.cloud/connect?ref=mcp-tools-list&tool=cluster_sites_by_latency",
    "readOnlyHint": true,
    "openWorldHint": false,
    "tier_required": "anonymous",
    "idempotentHint": true,
    "destructiveHint": false
  },
  "title": "Cluster Sites By Latency"
}
compare_sites 1 change
{
  "name": "compare_sites",
  "description": "Use this when the user has 2-4 candidate data center sites and asks which is best. Pass locations as \"lat,lon;lat,lon\" and optional capacity_mw. Returns each site's analyze_site scores side by side plus a recommended winner and why. Keyless returns each site's verdict band and power band, with the other factors named; a free key adds names and counts without figures; scores and figures need a paid DC Hub plan, as does the pick. Ex: \"Phoenix vs Ashburn for 50 MW?\"",
  "inputSchema": {
    "type": "object",
    "properties": {
      "sites": {
        "description": "Alternative to locations: an array of {lat, lon} (or {lat, lng}) objects, 2-4 sites",
        "type": "string"
      },
      "mpp_pay": {
        "type": "boolean",
        "description": "Per-call payment quote (Stripe MPP): true returns a signed payment challenge instead of the free preview; no money moves. Set it only after your human has explicitly approved paying for this call."
      },
      "locations": {
        "type": "string",
        "description": "Semicolon-separated list of 2-4 \"lat,lon\" pairs to compare, e.g. \"33.45,-112.07;39.04,-77.48\""
      },
      "capacity_mw": {
        "type": "number",
        "description": "Target power load for the build in megawatts (MW), e.g. 50 (typical 50-500)"
      },
      "mpp_credential": {
        "type": "string",
        "description": "Per-call payment (Stripe MPP): the Shared Payment Token for challenges[0]; pays that challenge for this one call. Send it only with your human's explicit approval of the charge."
      }
    }
  },
  "annotations": {
    "access": "paid",
    "maturity": "unknown",
    "pricing_url": "https://dchub.cloud/pricing/upgrade?tool=compare_sites&ref=mcp-tools-list",
    "readOnlyHint": true,
    "openWorldHint": false,
    "tier_required": "pro",
    "idempotentHint": true,
    "destructiveHint": false
  },
  "title": "Compare Sites"
}

Get alerted

Get an email or webhook when this server's readiness drops by 10+ points, tool-poisoning text appears, or a tool breaks:

curl -X POST https://glimind.com/v1/subscriptions -H 'content-type: application/json' -d '{"tools":["mcp-registry/cloud.dchub/datacenter-power-grid-fiber"],"email":"[email protected]"}'

Agents: watch_tool({"toolId": "mcp-registry/cloud.dchub/datacenter-power-grid-fiber"}) over MCP.

Passed

Largest tool definitions

Static checks of the advertised tools/list (schema, descriptions, annotations, tool-poisoning patterns, names, size) plus observed protocol, uptime, latency and contract changes. Read-only: no tool is ever called. Weights: schema 15, docs 20, safety 15, efficiency 15, compatibility 15, protocol 5, reliability 10, stability 5. Token counts are estimates (~3.6 characters per token).

Operator? Fix these, then re-check live. Embed the readiness badge:

Markdown
[![MCP agent-readiness](https://glimind.com/v1/readiness/badge/mcp-registry%2Fcloud.dchub%2Fdatacenter-power-grid-fiber.svg)](https://glimind.com/server/mcp-registry%2Fcloud.dchub%2Fdatacenter-power-grid-fiber?ref=badge)
HTML
<a href="https://glimind.com/server/mcp-registry%2Fcloud.dchub%2Fdatacenter-power-grid-fiber?ref=badge"><img src="https://glimind.com/v1/readiness/badge/mcp-registry%2Fcloud.dchub%2Fdatacenter-power-grid-fiber.svg" alt="MCP agent-readiness"></a>
reStructuredText
.. image:: https://glimind.com/v1/readiness/badge/mcp-registry%2Fcloud.dchub%2Fdatacenter-power-grid-fiber.svg
   :target: https://glimind.com/server/mcp-registry%2Fcloud.dchub%2Fdatacenter-power-grid-fiber?ref=badge
   :alt: MCP agent-readiness

Tool-definition log

Glimind records every version of this server's tool definitions in a signed, append-only transparency log. Current manifest sha256:8ad786f152eb233a…, first seen 2026-10-22, included at leaf 44639 of 44,731. Version history · verify what your client received.

Tools (94)

Compare: most reliable other servers · most reliable data servers · most reliable security servers · most reliable knowledge servers · most reliable ml servers

Know before your agent calls it

Glimind tells agents whether a server is up right now and how to call it, then fails over to a live alternative when it isn't.

Add Glimind — free, no signup:

Add to Cursor Add to VS Code

Claude Code

claude mcp add --transport http glimind https://glimind.com/mcp

Claude Desktop · Windsurf · Cline (mcpServers JSON)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "glimind": {
      "type": "http",
      "url": "https://glimind.com/mcp"
    }
  }
}

FAQ

Is the Dchub Datacenter Power Grid Fiber MCP server down right now?

As of 2026-10-22 07:58 UTC, the Dchub Datacenter Power Grid Fiber MCP server is up with a Glimind reliability score of 96/100 (grade A). Over the last 30 days it answered 100% of Glimind's liveness checks. It had 1 outage in 90 days, with a median recovery of 7 minutes.

How many tools does Dchub Datacenter Power Grid Fiber MCP server provide?

Dchub Datacenter Power Grid Fiber MCP server advertises 94 tools, including accept_capacity_terms, ai_capacity_index, analyze_parcel, analyze_site, bind_email.

How do I install Dchub Datacenter Power Grid Fiber MCP server?

Point your MCP client at this streamable-http endpoint: https://dchub.cloud/mcp/officialregistry

Is the Dchub Datacenter Power Grid Fiber MCP server safe to connect to an AI agent?

Glimind scanned all 94 tool definitions for tool-poisoning patterns — hidden or invisible characters, instructions that override the model, concealment from the user, requests to read credential or MCP config files, conversation exfiltration and cross-tool shadowing — and found none. This checks what the server tells the model, not what its code does; review the source before granting access to sensitive data.

Operator of Dchub Datacenter Power Grid Fiber MCP server?

Status page: 90-day uptime, every outage and how long it lasted.

Claim this listing to get the Verified operator marker, a remediation checklist and owner analytics, or embed the live badge from any of the tool pages above. Maintainers: alerts, deploy attestation and monthly reports.

Status is an automated estimate from Glimind's liveness checks (handshake and tool listing only; no tool is ever called) and may lag or differ from your network. Glimind is not affiliated with this server or its operator. Operator? Request a correction or opt out at https://glimind.com/opt-out.

Feedback
Help us improve