Is the Roboparts MCP server down?

mcp-registry/cc.roboparts/roboparts · v1.1.1

healthy
Last checked 2026-10-22 17:48 UTC · handshake 114ms

As of 2026-10-22 17:48 UTC, the Roboparts MCP server is up with a Glimind reliability score of 97/100 (grade A). Over the last 30 days it answered 100% of Glimind's liveness checks.

uptime (30d checks)
100%
checks observed
4,315
outages (90d)
0
tools
20

852 humanoid/bionic robot parts, 20 categories, 4-dimension compatibility checking. Vendor-neutral.

Install Roboparts MCP server

Add to Cursor Add to VS Code

Claude Code

claude mcp add --transport http roboparts-mcp-server https://roboparts.cc/mcp

Claude Desktop · Windsurf · Cline (mcpServers JSON)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "roboparts-mcp-server": {
      "type": "http",
      "url": "https://roboparts.cc/mcp"
    }
  }
}

Third-party server, listed as discovered. Review its source before installing.

Agent-readiness: B (83/100)

B (83/100): 0 error(s), 2 warning(s) across 20 tool(s); ~2,877 tokens of tool definitions.
Scores higher than 41% of 15,558 MCP servers Glimind has audited.
Its tool list costs an agent ~2,877 tokens per session — more than 50% of servers.
83 → 83 since 2026-10-17
no tool-poisoning patterns
Schemas100
Descriptions100
Safety hints30
Token cost100
Client compatibility70
Protocol100
Reliability85
Stability96

What to fix (4)

20 of 20 tool(s) carry no readOnlyHint/destructiveHint annotations.

Annotate read-only tools with {"readOnlyHint": true}. Agents and gateways can then run them without a confirmation prompt, and route around destructive ones. How to fix →

Tools: bom_compatibility_check, check_co_mount, check_compatibility, compare_components, explain_compose_frontier and 15 more

Handshake + tools/list takes ~1,955 ms.

Serve tools/list from memory, keep the process warm, and host close to your users. Every new agent session pays this before its first call.

No tool declares an outputSchema.

Declare outputSchema and return structuredContent (MCP 2025-06-18+). Agents can then parse results without guessing, and chain tools reliably. How to fix →

In the last 30 days: 0 tool(s) removed and 1 schema change(s).

Add new tools or optional parameters instead of renaming or removing; deprecate first (say so in the description) and remove later. Agents cache tool contracts. How to fix →

Auto-fix: 18 corrected tool definitions

Paste-ready definitions with the problems above fixed. Changes marked verify need a human look. All of them as JSON: /v1/readiness/mcp-registry%2Fcc.roboparts%2Froboparts/fixes

bom_compatibility_check 1 change
{
  "name": "bom_compatibility_check",
  "description": "对一组零部件(BOM,物料清单)做两两兼容性矩阵。输入已有条目 ID(可含开源贡献层 OSS-xxx),返回每个组合在 protocol/electrical/mechanical/software 四维的判定与理由。判定基于厂商公开声明字段的规则推断而非实测;未声明维度记为无法判定,不会为了填满矩阵而编造结论。返回的 verdict_reason 才是结论依据,overall_compatible=null 表示\"证据不足\",不等于不兼容。",
  "inputSchema": {
    "type": "object",
    "required": [
      "component_ids"
    ],
    "properties": {
      "component_ids": {
        "type": "array",
        "items": {
          "type": "string"
        },
        "description": "待校验的零件 ID 列表,如 [\"ACT-001\",\"SENS-001\",\"PROTO-012\"]。ID 必须真实存在:先用 search_components 取得,不要自行拼造(ID 前缀与 category 非一一对应)。支持主库零件与开源贡献层 OSS-xxx 混合。至少传 2 个才有意义。"
      }
    }
  },
  "annotations": {
    "readOnlyHint": true
  }
}
check_co_mount 1 change
{
  "name": "check_co_mount",
  "description": "查询**共装**关系(第三种关系类型,三段 A↔宿主↔B):某个机器人本体能否同时装下两个器件(典型问题:「这台 UR5e 能同时装夹爪和六轴力传感器吗」)。与 check_compatibility 的区别:后者判「A 能不能插进 B」(二段互插),本工具判「A 和 B 能不能同时挂在同一台机器人的工具侧」。★ 三段判据:机械同型 + 宿主工具侧位数预算 + 信号角色互补。port_exhausted 表示「**装不下**(工程约束,如需转接/换本体)」,与 unknown(「数据不足,不知道」)严格区分。★ 参数:传 host+a+b 得单对裁决(附证据链);只传 host 得该宿主的单件可装性 + 工具侧取证;不传参得全层摘要(含关系语义与示例)。只读、免鉴权。返回含 caliber 字段,口径与 check_compatibility 不同、不可混用。",
  "inputSchema": {
    "type": "object",
    "required": [],
    "properties": {
      "a": {
        "type": "string",
        "description": "器件 A 的实体 id,如 ACT-028。需与 b 同时给。"
      },
      "b": {
        "type": "string",
        "description": "器件 B 的实体 id,如 SENS-047。需与 a 同时给。"
      },
      "host": {
        "type": "string",
        "description": "宿主机器人 id,如 HUB-030(UR3e)、HUB-031(UR5e)、SUPERDEX-fr3。"
      }
    }
  },
  "annotations": {
    "readOnlyHint": true
  }
}
check_compatibility 1 change
{
  "name": "check_compatibility",
  "description": "判定两个零部件在 protocol(协议)/ electrical(电气)/ mechanical(机械)/ software(ROS2)四个维度的兼容性,返回逐维结论、总体判定与置信说明。注意:结论基于厂商公开声明字段做规则推断,非实验室实测;厂商未声明的维度记为\"无法判定\",既不计入兼容也不计入不兼容。",
  "inputSchema": {
    "type": "object",
    "required": [
      "component1_id",
      "component2_id"
    ],
    "properties": {
      "component1_id": {
        "type": "string",
        "description": "零件 1 的 ID,形如 ACT-001 / CHIP-001 / PROTO-012。请先用 search_components 取得,不要自行拼造:ID 前缀与 category 并非一一对应(例如 sensors 品类下存在 CHIP-67,platforms 下存在 ACT-patsnap-actuator;实时不一致条数见 GET /mcp 的 dataset.id_category_mismatch),按品类猜前缀会取到错误条目或直接查无此项。"
      },
      "component2_id": {
        "type": "string",
        "description": "零件 2 的 ID,取值方式同 component1_id。两个 ID 可以属于不同品类(跨品类比对正是本工具的用途)。"
      }
    }
  },
  "annotations": {
    "readOnlyHint": true
  }
}

Get alerted

Get an email or webhook when this server's readiness drops by 10+ points, tool-poisoning text appears, or a tool breaks:

curl -X POST https://glimind.com/v1/subscriptions -H 'content-type: application/json' -d '{"tools":["mcp-registry/cc.roboparts/roboparts"],"email":"[email protected]"}'

Agents: watch_tool({"toolId": "mcp-registry/cc.roboparts/roboparts"}) over MCP.

Passed

Largest tool definitions

Static checks of the advertised tools/list (schema, descriptions, annotations, tool-poisoning patterns, names, size) plus observed protocol, uptime, latency and contract changes. Read-only: no tool is ever called. Weights: schema 15, docs 20, safety 15, efficiency 15, compatibility 15, protocol 5, reliability 10, stability 5. Token counts are estimates (~3.6 characters per token).

Operator? Fix these, then re-check live. Embed the readiness badge:

Markdown
[![MCP agent-readiness](https://glimind.com/v1/readiness/badge/mcp-registry%2Fcc.roboparts%2Froboparts.svg)](https://glimind.com/server/mcp-registry%2Fcc.roboparts%2Froboparts?ref=badge)
HTML
<a href="https://glimind.com/server/mcp-registry%2Fcc.roboparts%2Froboparts?ref=badge"><img src="https://glimind.com/v1/readiness/badge/mcp-registry%2Fcc.roboparts%2Froboparts.svg" alt="MCP agent-readiness"></a>
reStructuredText
.. image:: https://glimind.com/v1/readiness/badge/mcp-registry%2Fcc.roboparts%2Froboparts.svg
   :target: https://glimind.com/server/mcp-registry%2Fcc.roboparts%2Froboparts?ref=badge
   :alt: MCP agent-readiness

Tool-definition log

Glimind records every version of this server's tool definitions in a signed, append-only transparency log. Current manifest sha256:c6089607dd13c835…, first seen 2026-10-17, included at leaf 4092 of 47,314. Version history · verify what your client received.

Tools (20)

Compare: most reliable data servers · most reliable knowledge servers · most reliable code servers · most reliable ml servers · most reliable search servers

Know before your agent calls it

Glimind tells agents whether a server is up right now and how to call it, then fails over to a live alternative when it isn't.

Add Glimind — free, no signup:

Add to Cursor Add to VS Code

Claude Code

claude mcp add --transport http glimind https://glimind.com/mcp

Claude Desktop · Windsurf · Cline (mcpServers JSON)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "glimind": {
      "type": "http",
      "url": "https://glimind.com/mcp"
    }
  }
}

FAQ

Is the Roboparts MCP server down right now?

As of 2026-10-22 17:48 UTC, the Roboparts MCP server is up with a Glimind reliability score of 97/100 (grade A). Over the last 30 days it answered 100% of Glimind's liveness checks.

How many tools does Roboparts MCP server provide?

Roboparts MCP server advertises 20 tools, including bom_compatibility_check, check_co_mount, check_compatibility, compare_components, explain_compose_frontier.

How do I install Roboparts MCP server?

Point your MCP client at this streamable-http endpoint: https://roboparts.cc/mcp

Is the Roboparts MCP server safe to connect to an AI agent?

Glimind scanned all 20 tool definitions for tool-poisoning patterns — hidden or invisible characters, instructions that override the model, concealment from the user, requests to read credential or MCP config files, conversation exfiltration and cross-tool shadowing — and found none. This checks what the server tells the model, not what its code does; review the source before granting access to sensitive data.

Operator of Roboparts MCP server?

Status page: 90-day uptime, every outage and how long it lasted.

Claim this listing to get the Verified operator marker, a remediation checklist and owner analytics, or embed the live badge from any of the tool pages above. Maintainers: alerts, deploy attestation and monthly reports.

Status is an automated estimate from Glimind's liveness checks (handshake and tool listing only; no tool is ever called) and may lag or differ from your network. Glimind is not affiliated with this server or its operator. Operator? Request a correction or opt out at https://glimind.com/opt-out.

Feedback
Help us improve