Is the Taskive MCP server down?

mcp-registry/ai.taskive/mcp · vQuery and manage tasks, projects, teams, and boards in Taskive via MCP. Authenti

up · requires sign-in
Last checked 2026-10-26 18:05 UTC · handshake 102ms

As of 2026-10-26 18:05 UTC, the Taskive MCP server is up (it requires sign-in) with a Glimind reliability score of 90/100 (grade A). Over the last 30 days it answered 100% of Glimind's liveness checks.

uptime (30d checks)
100%
checks observed
207
outages (90d)
0
tools
98

AI-native project management + agent memory: tasks, sprints, risk, burnout, knowledge search.

Point your MCP client at this streamable-http endpoint: https://mcp.taskive.ai/mcp

Agent-readiness: D (57/100)

D (57/100): 0 error(s), 5 warning(s) across 98 tool(s); ~23,251 tokens of tool definitions.
Scores higher than 0% of 15,768 MCP servers Glimind has audited.
Its tool list costs an agent ~23,251 tokens per session — more than 95% of servers.
57 → 57 since 2026-10-17
no tool-poisoning patterns
Schemas100
Descriptions30
Safety hints0
Token cost35
Client compatibility70
Protocol100
Reliability100
Stability100

What to fix (7)

98 of 98 tool(s) carry no readOnlyHint/destructiveHint annotations.

Annotate read-only tools with {"readOnlyHint": true}. Agents and gateways can then run them without a confirmation prompt, and route around destructive ones. How to fix →

Tools: add_project_member, add_task_blocker, add_task_dependency, ai_health, archive_project and 93 more

98 tools on one server. Tool-selection accuracy drops as the menu grows, and some clients (e.g. Cursor) cap the number of active tools.

Group tools by task into smaller servers or toolsets, and merge near-duplicates behind one tool with a mode parameter. How to fix →

206 parameter(s) across 88 tool(s) have no description.

Add a "description" to each parameter with its format and an example ("ISO 8601 date, e.g. 2026-10-17"). This is the commonest cause of wrong arguments on the first call. How to fix →

Tools: add_project_member, add_task_blocker, add_task_dependency, archive_project, bulk_assign and 83 more

35 tool(s) look like they change state (create/send/delete/pay…) but declare no destructiveHint.

Set annotations {"readOnlyHint": false, "destructiveHint": true|false, "idempotentHint": …}. Clients use these to ask the user before a side effect and to auto-approve safe reads. How to fix →

Tools: archive_project, create_comment, create_epic, create_field_schema, create_project and 30 more

Loading this server's tool list costs an agent ~23,251 tokens before any work — more than 95% of MCP servers.

Split rarely-used tools into a separate server or a toolset the client can enable, or expose one "search tools" entry point. Many agents load every connected server's tools into every request. How to fix →

No tool declares an outputSchema.

Declare outputSchema and return structuredContent (MCP 2025-06-18+). Agents can then parse results without guessing, and chain tools reliably. How to fix →

Requires authentication (Bearer); tool definitions could not be read anonymously.

If discovery should be public, allow initialize + tools/list without credentials and gate only tools/call. Directories and routers can then list your tools.

Auto-fix: 85 corrected tool definitions

Paste-ready definitions with the problems above fixed. Changes marked verify need a human look. 88 tool(s) still need parameter descriptions written by someone who knows the API. All of them as JSON: /v1/readiness/mcp-registry%2Fai.taskive%2Fmcp/fixes

add_project_member 1 change
{
  "name": "add_project_member",
  "description": "Add Project Member\n\nPRIV-03: Grant an org user access to a private project.\n\nAuthorization: only the project's creator or admin/owner (T-264-02). Access\nmanagement is creator-scoped, not RBAC-gated — no new permission slug needed.\n\n### Responses:\n\n**201**: Successful Response (Success Response)\nContent-Type: application/json\n\n**Example Response:**\n```json\n{\n  \"user_id\": \"User Id\",\n  \"email\": \"Email\",\n  \"role\": \"Role\"\n}\n```\n\n**Output Schema:**\n```json\n{\n  \"properties\": {\n    \"user_id\": {\n      \"t",
  "inputSchema": {
    "type": "object",
    "title": "add_project_memberArguments",
    "required": [
      "project_id",
      "user_id"
    ],
    "properties": {
      "user_id": {
        "type": "string",
        "title": "user_id"
      },
      "project_id": {
        "type": "string",
        "title": "project_id",
        "format": "uuid"
      }
    }
  },
  "annotations": {
    "readOnlyHint": false,
    "destructiveHint": false,
    "idempotentHint": false
  }
}
add_task_blocker 1 change
{
  "name": "add_task_blocker",
  "description": "Add Blocker\n\nTASK-06: Mark task_id as blocking another task (blocker → blocked).\nT-04 mitigation: self-blocking rejected (blocker_task_id == blocked_task_id → 422).\nSEC-MCP-01: both anchor (task_id) and target (blocked_task_id) must belong to the\ncaller's org before the INSERT — otherwise a caller could link a foreign org's task.\n\n### Responses:\n\n**200**: Successful Response (Success Response)\nContent-Type: application/json\n\n**Output Schema:**\n```json\n{}\n```\n**422**: Validation Error\nContent-Typ",
  "inputSchema": {
    "type": "object",
    "title": "add_task_blockerArguments",
    "required": [
      "task_id"
    ],
    "properties": {
      "task_id": {
        "type": "string",
        "title": "task_id",
        "format": "uuid"
      }
    }
  },
  "annotations": {
    "readOnlyHint": false,
    "destructiveHint": false,
    "idempotentHint": false
  }
}
add_task_dependency 1 change
{
  "name": "add_task_dependency",
  "description": "Add Dependency\n\nAdd a blocker to this task (from blocked perspective): blocker_task_id must complete first.\n\nSEC-MCP-01: both anchor (task_id) and target (blocker_task_id) must belong to the\ncaller's org before the INSERT — otherwise a caller could link a foreign org's task.\n\n### Responses:\n\n**200**: Successful Response (Success Response)\nContent-Type: application/json\n\n**Output Schema:**\n```json\n{}\n```\n**422**: Validation Error\nContent-Type: application/json\n\n**Example Response:**\n```json\n{\n  \"",
  "inputSchema": {
    "type": "object",
    "title": "add_task_dependencyArguments",
    "required": [
      "task_id"
    ],
    "properties": {
      "task_id": {
        "type": "string",
        "title": "task_id",
        "format": "uuid"
      }
    }
  },
  "annotations": {
    "readOnlyHint": false,
    "destructiveHint": false,
    "idempotentHint": false
  }
}

Get alerted

Get an email or webhook when this server's readiness drops by 10+ points, tool-poisoning text appears, or a tool breaks:

curl -X POST https://glimind.com/v1/subscriptions -H 'content-type: application/json' -d '{"tools":["mcp-registry/ai.taskive/mcp"],"email":"[email protected]"}'

Agents: watch_tool({"toolId": "mcp-registry/ai.taskive/mcp"}) over MCP.

Passed

Largest tool definitions

Static checks of the advertised tools/list (schema, descriptions, annotations, tool-poisoning patterns, names, size) plus observed protocol, uptime, latency and contract changes. Read-only: no tool is ever called. Weights: schema 15, docs 20, safety 15, efficiency 15, compatibility 15, protocol 5, reliability 10, stability 5. Token counts are estimates (~3.6 characters per token).

Operator? Fix these, then re-check live. Embed the readiness badge:

Markdown
[![MCP agent-readiness](https://glimind.com/v1/readiness/badge/mcp-registry%2Fai.taskive%2Fmcp.svg)](https://glimind.com/server/mcp-registry%2Fai.taskive%2Fmcp?ref=badge)
HTML
<a href="https://glimind.com/server/mcp-registry%2Fai.taskive%2Fmcp?ref=badge"><img src="https://glimind.com/v1/readiness/badge/mcp-registry%2Fai.taskive%2Fmcp.svg" alt="MCP agent-readiness"></a>
reStructuredText
.. image:: https://glimind.com/v1/readiness/badge/mcp-registry%2Fai.taskive%2Fmcp.svg
   :target: https://glimind.com/server/mcp-registry%2Fai.taskive%2Fmcp?ref=badge
   :alt: MCP agent-readiness

Tool-definition log

Glimind records every version of this server's tool definitions in a signed, append-only transparency log. Current manifest sha256:3129264bd3eb6be7…, first seen 2026-10-17, included at leaf 12935 of 74,608. Version history · verify what your client received.

Tools (98)

Compare: most reliable data servers · most reliable other servers · most reliable productivity servers · most reliable communication servers · most reliable knowledge servers

Know before your agent calls it

Glimind tells agents whether a server is up right now and how to call it, then fails over to a live alternative when it isn't.

Add Glimind — free, no signup:

Add to Cursor Add to VS Code

Claude Code

claude mcp add --transport http glimind https://glimind.com/mcp

Claude Desktop · Windsurf · Cline (mcpServers JSON)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "glimind": {
      "type": "http",
      "url": "https://glimind.com/mcp"
    }
  }
}

FAQ

Is the Taskive MCP server down right now?

As of 2026-10-26 18:05 UTC, the Taskive MCP server is up (it requires sign-in) with a Glimind reliability score of 90/100 (grade A). Over the last 30 days it answered 100% of Glimind's liveness checks.

How many tools does Taskive MCP server provide?

Taskive MCP server advertises 98 tools, including add_project_member, add_task_blocker, add_task_dependency, ai_health, archive_project.

How do I install Taskive MCP server?

Point your MCP client at this streamable-http endpoint: https://mcp.taskive.ai/mcp

Is the Taskive MCP server safe to connect to an AI agent?

Glimind scanned all 98 tool definitions for tool-poisoning patterns — hidden or invisible characters, instructions that override the model, concealment from the user, requests to read credential or MCP config files, conversation exfiltration and cross-tool shadowing — and found none. This checks what the server tells the model, not what its code does; review the source before granting access to sensitive data.

Operator of Taskive MCP server?

Status page: 90-day uptime, every outage and how long it lasted.

Claim this listing to get the Verified operator marker, a remediation checklist and owner analytics, or embed the live badge from any of the tool pages above. Maintainers: alerts, deploy attestation and monthly reports.

Status is an automated estimate from Glimind's liveness checks (handshake and tool listing only; no tool is ever called) and may lag or differ from your network. Glimind is not affiliated with this server or its operator. Operator? Request a correction or opt out at https://glimind.com/opt-out.

Feedback
Help us improve