Verdict. Briefverzenden Post MCP server was the more reliable of the two over the last 30 days: 100% uptime against 99.93% (0.07 points). Star365 Hq MCP server answers faster (630 vs 826 ms median). Both are graded on the same Glimind checks.
Data as of .
| Metric | Briefverzenden Post MCP server | Star365 Hq MCP server |
|---|---|---|
| Uptime, 30 days | 100% | 99.93% |
| Median handshake latency | 826 ms | 630 ms |
| p95 handshake latency | 3135 ms | 2749 ms |
| Checks in 30 days | 4,884 | 4,897 |
| Outages, 90 days | 0 | 1 |
| Median recovery | — | 24 min |
| Agent-readiness score | 91/100 (A) | 96/100 (A) |
| Tools | 5 | 15 |
| Tool-list size for an agent | ~1,210 tokens | ~3,981 tokens |
| Days observed | 29 | 29 |
Briefverzenden Post MCP server was the more reliable of the two over the last 30 days: 100% uptime against 99.93% (0.07 points). Star365 Hq MCP server answers faster (630 vs 826 ms median). Both are graded on the same Glimind checks.
Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http briefverzenden-post-mcp-server https://www.briefverzenden.nl/api/mcp
Claude Desktop · Windsurf · Cline (mcpServers JSON)
{
"mcpServers": {
"briefverzenden-post-mcp-server": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://www.briefverzenden.nl/api/mcp"
}
}
}
Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http star365-hq-mcp-server https://mcp.star365.site/mcp
Claude Desktop · Windsurf · Cline (mcpServers JSON)
{
"mcpServers": {
"star365-hq-mcp-server": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://mcp.star365.site/mcp"
}
}
}
Third-party servers, listed as discovered. Glimind is not affiliated with either. Figures are automated measurements from one region and may lag.