Verdict. Krystalview MCP server was the more reliable of the two over the last 30 days: 99.95% uptime against 99.91% (0.04 points). Heera Agentimus MCP server answers faster (1053 vs 1098 ms median). Both are graded on the same Glimind checks.
Data as of .
| Metric | Krystalview MCP server | Heera Agentimus MCP server |
|---|---|---|
| Uptime, 30 days | 99.95% | 99.91% |
| Median handshake latency | 1098 ms | 1053 ms |
| p95 handshake latency | 3519 ms | 3023 ms |
| Checks in 30 days | 4,963 | 4,947 |
| Outages, 90 days | 9 | 2 |
| Median recovery | 6 min | 8 min |
| Agent-readiness score | 100/100 (A) | 100/100 (A) |
| Tools | 13 | 16 |
| Tool-list size for an agent | ~1,406 tokens | ~3,241 tokens |
| Days observed | 29 | 29 |
Krystalview MCP server was the more reliable of the two over the last 30 days: 99.95% uptime against 99.91% (0.04 points). Heera Agentimus MCP server answers faster (1053 vs 1098 ms median). Both are graded on the same Glimind checks.
Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http krystalview-mcp-server https://krystalview.com/mcp
Claude Desktop · Windsurf · Cline (mcpServers JSON)
{
"mcpServers": {
"krystalview-mcp-server": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://krystalview.com/mcp"
}
}
}
Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http heera-agentimus-mcp-server https://heera.it/wp-json/agentimus/v1/mcp
Claude Desktop · Windsurf · Cline (mcpServers JSON)
{
"mcpServers": {
"heera-agentimus-mcp-server": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://heera.it/wp-json/agentimus/v1/mcp"
}
}
}
Third-party servers, listed as discovered. Glimind is not affiliated with either. Figures are automated measurements from one region and may lag.