Verdict. Hotelumo MCP server was the more reliable of the two over the last 30 days: 100% uptime against 99.97% (0.03 points). Hotelumo MCP server answers faster (932 vs 1138 ms median). Both are graded on the same Glimind checks.
Data as of .
| Metric | Hotelumo MCP server | Steledger Gateway MCP server |
|---|---|---|
| Uptime, 30 days | 100% | 99.97% |
| Median handshake latency | 932 ms | 1138 ms |
| p95 handshake latency | 3667 ms | 3393 ms |
| Checks in 30 days | 4,963 | 4,959 |
| Outages, 90 days | 0 | 2 |
| Median recovery | — | 7 min |
| Agent-readiness score | 98/100 (A) | 100/100 (A) |
| Tools | 11 | 9 |
| Tool-list size for an agent | ~2,683 tokens | ~2,705 tokens |
| Days observed | 29 | 29 |
Hotelumo MCP server was the more reliable of the two over the last 30 days: 100% uptime against 99.97% (0.03 points). Hotelumo MCP server answers faster (932 vs 1138 ms median). Both are graded on the same Glimind checks.
Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http hotelumo-mcp-server https://mcp.hotelumo.com/mcp
Claude Desktop · Windsurf · Cline (mcpServers JSON)
{
"mcpServers": {
"hotelumo-mcp-server": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://mcp.hotelumo.com/mcp"
}
}
}
Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http steledger-gateway-mcp-server https://api.steledger.com/mcp
Claude Desktop · Windsurf · Cline (mcpServers JSON)
{
"mcpServers": {
"steledger-gateway-mcp-server": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://api.steledger.com/mcp"
}
}
}
Third-party servers, listed as discovered. Glimind is not affiliated with either. Figures are automated measurements from one region and may lag.