Verdict. Nanocorp Invoke Human Tasks MCP server was the more reliable of the two over the last 30 days: 99.97% uptime against 99.97% (0 points). Deslay1 Amendor MCP server answers faster (560 vs 1491 ms median). Both are graded on the same Glimind checks.
Data as of .
| Metric | Nanocorp Invoke Human Tasks MCP server | Deslay1 Amendor MCP server |
|---|---|---|
| Uptime, 30 days | 99.97% | 99.97% |
| Median handshake latency | 1491 ms | 560 ms |
| p95 handshake latency | 3804 ms | 2837 ms |
| Checks in 30 days | 4,967 | 4,918 |
| Outages, 90 days | 1 | 2 |
| Median recovery | 7 min | 62 min |
| Agent-readiness score | 100/100 (A) | 100/100 (A) |
| Tools | 3 | 4 |
| Tool-list size for an agent | ~1,440 tokens | ~548 tokens |
| Days observed | 29 | 29 |
Nanocorp Invoke Human Tasks MCP server was the more reliable of the two over the last 30 days: 99.97% uptime against 99.97% (0 points). Deslay1 Amendor MCP server answers faster (560 vs 1491 ms median). Both are graded on the same Glimind checks.
Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http nanocorp-invoke-human-tasks-mcp-server https://invoke.nanocorp.app/mcp
Claude Desktop · Windsurf · Cline (mcpServers JSON)
{
"mcpServers": {
"nanocorp-invoke-human-tasks-mcp-server": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://invoke.nanocorp.app/mcp"
}
}
}
Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http deslay1-amendor-mcp-server https://amendor.site/mcp
Claude Desktop · Windsurf · Cline (mcpServers JSON)
{
"mcpServers": {
"deslay1-amendor-mcp-server": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://amendor.site/mcp"
}
}
}
Third-party servers, listed as discovered. Glimind is not affiliated with either. Figures are automated measurements from one region and may lag.