Nanocorp Invoke Human Tasks MCP server vs Tilwhen MCP server

Verdict. Tilwhen MCP server was the more reliable of the two over the last 30 days: 100% uptime against 99.98% (0.02 points). Tilwhen MCP server answers faster (596 vs 1462 ms median). Both are graded on the same Glimind checks.

Data as of .

30-day measurements from Glimind's checks · category: productivity
MetricNanocorp Invoke Human Tasks MCP serverTilwhen MCP server
Uptime, 30 days99.98%100%
Median handshake latency1462 ms596 ms
p95 handshake latency3777 ms2834 ms
Checks in 30 days5,0174,978
Outages, 90 days10
Median recovery7 min—
Agent-readiness score100/100 (A)100/100 (A)
Tools39
Tool-list size for an agent~1,440 tokens~3,011 tokens
Days observed2929

Which is more reliable, Nanocorp Invoke Human Tasks MCP server or Tilwhen MCP server?

Tilwhen MCP server was the more reliable of the two over the last 30 days: 100% uptime against 99.98% (0.02 points). Tilwhen MCP server answers faster (596 vs 1462 ms median). Both are graded on the same Glimind checks.

How do I install them?

Install Nanocorp Invoke Human Tasks MCP server

Add to Cursor Add to VS Code

Claude Code

claude mcp add --transport http nanocorp-invoke-human-tasks-mcp-server https://invoke.nanocorp.app/mcp

Claude Desktop · Windsurf · Cline (mcpServers JSON)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "nanocorp-invoke-human-tasks-mcp-server": {
      "type": "http",
      "url": "https://invoke.nanocorp.app/mcp"
    }
  }
}

Install Tilwhen MCP server

Add to Cursor Add to VS Code

Claude Code

claude mcp add --transport http tilwhen-mcp-server https://mcp.tilwhen.com/mcp

Claude Desktop · Windsurf · Cline (mcpServers JSON)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "tilwhen-mcp-server": {
      "type": "http",
      "url": "https://mcp.tilwhen.com/mcp"
    }
  }
}

Third-party servers, listed as discovered. Glimind is not affiliated with either. Figures are automated measurements from one region and may lag.

More: all comparisons · most reliable productivity servers

Feedback
Help us improve