Actiondock MCP server vs Ticktape MCP server

Verdict. Actiondock MCP server and Ticktape MCP server had the same 30-day uptime in Glimind's checks (100%). Ticktape MCP server answers faster (812 vs 842 ms median). Ticktape MCP server had fewer outages in 90 days (0 vs 1).

Data as of .

30-day measurements from Glimind's checks · category: other
MetricActiondock MCP serverTicktape MCP server
Uptime, 30 days100%100%
Median handshake latency842 ms812 ms
p95 handshake latency2979 ms2834 ms
Checks in 30 days4,9124,946
Outages, 90 days10
Median recovery14 min—
Agent-readiness score100/100 (A)100/100 (A)
Tools85
Tool-list size for an agent~1,312 tokens~998 tokens
Days observed2929

Which is more reliable, Actiondock MCP server or Ticktape MCP server?

Actiondock MCP server and Ticktape MCP server had the same 30-day uptime in Glimind's checks (100%). Ticktape MCP server answers faster (812 vs 842 ms median). Ticktape MCP server had fewer outages in 90 days (0 vs 1).

How do I install them?

Install Actiondock MCP server

Add to Cursor Add to VS Code

Claude Code

claude mcp add --transport http actiondock-mcp-server https://actiondock.app/mcp

Claude Desktop · Windsurf · Cline (mcpServers JSON)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "actiondock-mcp-server": {
      "type": "http",
      "url": "https://actiondock.app/mcp"
    }
  }
}

Install Ticktape MCP server

Add to Cursor Add to VS Code

Claude Code

claude mcp add --transport http ticktape-mcp-server https://ticktape.cc/mcp

Claude Desktop · Windsurf · Cline (mcpServers JSON)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "ticktape-mcp-server": {
      "type": "http",
      "url": "https://ticktape.cc/mcp"
    }
  }
}

Third-party servers, listed as discovered. Glimind is not affiliated with either. Figures are automated measurements from one region and may lag.

More: all comparisons · most reliable other servers

Feedback
Help us improve