Verdict. Glasswarp MCP server was the more reliable of the two over the last 30 days: 100% uptime against 99.97% (0.03 points). Webrun MCP server answers faster (932 vs 1046 ms median). Both are graded on the same Glimind checks.
Data as of .
| Metric | Webrun MCP server | Glasswarp MCP server |
|---|---|---|
| Uptime, 30 days | 99.97% | 100% |
| Median handshake latency | 932 ms | 1046 ms |
| p95 handshake latency | 3345 ms | 3263 ms |
| Checks in 30 days | 4,936 | 4,917 |
| Outages, 90 days | 1 | 4 |
| Median recovery | 7 min | 7 min |
| Agent-readiness score | 97/100 (A) | 93/100 (A) |
| Tools | 21 | 16 |
| Tool-list size for an agent | ~13,853 tokens | ~3,603 tokens |
| Days observed | 29 | 29 |
Glasswarp MCP server was the more reliable of the two over the last 30 days: 100% uptime against 99.97% (0.03 points). Webrun MCP server answers faster (932 vs 1046 ms median). Both are graded on the same Glimind checks.
Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http webrun-mcp-server https://api.webrun.ai/mcp
Claude Desktop · Windsurf · Cline (mcpServers JSON)
{
"mcpServers": {
"webrun-mcp-server": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://api.webrun.ai/mcp"
}
}
}
Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http glasswarp-mcp-server https://mcp.glasswarp.com/mcp
Claude Desktop · Windsurf · Cline (mcpServers JSON)
{
"mcpServers": {
"glasswarp-mcp-server": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://mcp.glasswarp.com/mcp"
}
}
}
Third-party servers, listed as discovered. Glimind is not affiliated with either. Figures are automated measurements from one region and may lag.