mcp-registry/io.github.laibniz/scholarfetch/scholarfetch_references / alternatives
mcp-registry/io.github.laibniz/scholarfetch/scholarfetch_referencesThe best live alternatives to mcp-registry/io.github.laibniz/scholarfetch/scholarfetch_references right now are mcp-registry/io.github.mcpservings/paper-mcp/get_papers_batch, mcp-registry/io.github.mcpservings/paper-mcp/get_paper_references, mcp-registry/io.github.mcpservings/paper-mcp/search_all, mcp-registry/io.github.lazymac2x/citation-verifier/extract_citations, mcp-registry/io.github.pipeworx-io/crossref/search_works — capability-matched and ranked by current reliability. mcp-registry/io.github.laibniz/scholarfetch/scholarfetch_references itself is currently "healthy".
mcp-registry/io.github.mcpservings/paper-mcp/get_papers_batch is the top capability-matched alternative that's live right now. Other options: mcp-registry/io.github.mcpservings/paper-mcp/get_paper_references, mcp-registry/io.github.mcpservings/paper-mcp/search_all, mcp-registry/io.github.lazymac2x/citation-verifier/extract_citations, mcp-registry/io.github.pipeworx-io/crossref/search_works. Glimind ranks alternatives by semantic similarity and live health.
mcp-registry/io.github.laibniz/scholarfetch/scholarfetch_references's current verdict is "healthy". See its live status and score at https://glimind.com/tool/mcp-registry%2Fio.github.laibniz%2Fscholarfetch%2Fscholarfetch_references.
By semantic capability match (what the tool does) filtered to tools that are healthy right now — from cross-ecosystem real usage. Neutral: Glimind sells no tools.
Get a live, capability-matched substitute in one call: GET https://glimind.com/v1/alternatives/mcp-registry%2Fio.github.laibniz%2Fscholarfetch%2Fscholarfetch_references
or MCP find_alternatives. Check mcp-registry/io.github.laibniz/scholarfetch/scholarfetch_references's live status: https://glimind.com/tool/mcp-registry/io.github.laibniz/scholarfetch/scholarfetch_references.