mcp-registry/io.github.laibniz/scholarfetch/scholarfetch_author_candidates / alternatives
mcp-registry/io.github.laibniz/scholarfetch/scholarfetch_author_candidatesThe best live alternatives to mcp-registry/io.github.laibniz/scholarfetch/scholarfetch_author_candidates right now are mcp-registry/io.github.pipeworx-io/semanticscholar/get_author, mcp-registry/io.github.mcpservings/paper-mcp/get_author_papers, mcp-registry/io.github.mcpservings/paper-mcp/search_openalex_authors, mcp-registry/io.github.mcpservings/paper-mcp/get_authors_batch, mcp-registry/io.tooloracle/researchoracle/author_papers — capability-matched and ranked by current reliability. mcp-registry/io.github.laibniz/scholarfetch/scholarfetch_author_candidates itself is currently "healthy".
mcp-registry/io.github.pipeworx-io/semanticscholar/get_author is the top capability-matched alternative that's live right now. Other options: mcp-registry/io.github.mcpservings/paper-mcp/get_author_papers, mcp-registry/io.github.mcpservings/paper-mcp/search_openalex_authors, mcp-registry/io.github.mcpservings/paper-mcp/get_authors_batch, mcp-registry/io.tooloracle/researchoracle/author_papers. Glimind ranks alternatives by semantic similarity and live health.
mcp-registry/io.github.laibniz/scholarfetch/scholarfetch_author_candidates's current verdict is "healthy". See its live status and score at https://glimind.com/tool/mcp-registry%2Fio.github.laibniz%2Fscholarfetch%2Fscholarfetch_author_candidates.
By semantic capability match (what the tool does) filtered to tools that are healthy right now — from cross-ecosystem real usage. Neutral: Glimind sells no tools.
Get a live, capability-matched substitute in one call: GET https://glimind.com/v1/alternatives/mcp-registry%2Fio.github.laibniz%2Fscholarfetch%2Fscholarfetch_author_candidates
or MCP find_alternatives. Check mcp-registry/io.github.laibniz/scholarfetch/scholarfetch_author_candidates's live status: https://glimind.com/tool/mcp-registry/io.github.laibniz/scholarfetch/scholarfetch_author_candidates.